Interview
with Pamela
Curr
2,500 words
"There is a public face (in Australia)
of a democratic country with a good economy, where people are doing fine
- and then there is an underside."
I come from a fairly
conservative political background, but one where politics was always discussed.
I went into nursing
and did midwifery. In nursing you see many sides of life, you see people
who have and you see people who have not. You see the way
in which they struggle.This
first-hand experience gave me the understanding of how hard life is for
some people .
Although I am, I
suppose, an agnostic or an atheist now, I was educated in the Catholic
tradition. The church has a strong overlay of social justice and doing
unto others as you would that they do unto you. I think these things
become part of your philosophy and internal make-up - sometimes when you
don't realize it.
Then, moving on from
nursing and travelling and having babies and families and that sort of
thing, I came back to Australia from Holland in 1992 on my own as a sole
parent. At
that stage I was reassessing my life. I went to the Western Metropolitan
College of TAFE and did a Welfare Studies Diploma. I was worried about
returning to study but I found it a breeze, so I went on to VUT and completed
a B.A., Community Development stream.
Part of the reason
for moving away from Welfare to Community development was that the more
I studied and reflected, the more I realized that the problem does not
lie with the individual . The problem lies with society and the structures
that are set up for people to deal with. That is why I wanted to do that
course.In April
1996, on the 4 Corners television program on the Australian Broadcasting
Commission, there was a program about outworkers. These women sewing in
their homes, in Australia, in garages and loungerooms, for $2 an hour.I
couldn't believe it. I thought
"We've got a
basic wage, a minimum wage in this country.
We have industrial laws, and yet here are wrokers in Australia routinely
being underpaid and employers are getting away with it".
I set out to find
out if indeed it was happening.
At the time I was
doing Social Policy and I had to do an essay assignment so I thought I
would combine it with that. That program alerted me to something I hadn't
known could happen in Australia.So, I spoke to
the unions - I spoke to Annie Delaney from the TCF union, I spoke to the
churches and to some groups who had been involved in investigating this.Annie
said
"We are looking at setting up a community campaign
to work alongside the unions".
I thought about that and I thought
"Wow, that would really be something",
because the more I looked at it, the more I could see
that what we had here was a Third World economy with Third World conditions
operating in our beautiful, wealthy First World economy. The
contradictions were glaring. So, I came on board
with the Fairwear campaign before it was launched. I was working
as a student on placement, getting it up. Then, after it was launched,
as we got a little bit of money, I started working part-time. Initially
I was working 2 days a week, co-ordinating the activities.
During that campaign I met a lot of really brave, clever,
wonderful women. It reinforced for me the capacity for people to overcome
adversity. But it also showed up the question of why they should face
this. I remember standing at a picket one weekend,
outside a factory in Broadmeadows. The factory made shirts and suit for,
as it turned out, people like Jeff Kennett - the right-wing Premier of
Victoria. These women told me they knew of factories
where the women would go to work and find a red dot on their sewing machine,
indicating they hadn't sewed the required amount the day before. This
put them on notice - if retrenchments were happening - they were sacked.
They were also timed when they went to the toilet and
heavily supervised. They told me how they came to work and were told to
do a certain amount of, say, collars. It was something astronomical like
4,000 collars in a day.They would come to work
and find the collars hadn't been correctly cut. So the women had to recut
them. But that wasn't factored into the time they were allowed. So they
would still end up with a red dot.
I realized that it wasn't just outworkers, it was in-factory
workers, working under legal conditions, with all the protections that
should involve, who were still being really badly treated.I
spent five and a half years with the Fairwear campaign. They were
fantastic years. I learnt a lot. I worked with wonderful people. Annie
Delaney was one of the people who really inspired me.
Annie has an incredible energy, a very clear focus and
great integrity. That is the sort of thing you need to take you through
a campaign where you are constantly being asked to do deals - to pass
over things. Because this was what we were asked. This was a hard campaign
for politicians and employers.In the beginning
they denied it was happening. By the end, they knew they had to acknowledge
it. We got state legislation in the end. We wanted national legislation,
we didn't get it. But in the meantime we fought
two successive waves of Peter Reith trying to undermine workers' conditions.
We were at the forefront of that, and the situation of outworkers was
so well known and accepted that the politicians couldn't go around it.
From there, I saw the refugee issue was growing. It disturbed
me in 1992 when I realized that people were locked up in detention at
Port Hedland. Of course, it was so far away, there were very infrequent
stories about it. At that stage the people had
some freedoms. They were allowed to go in and out of the camp - that sort
of thing. But Labor opened a Pandora's box when they passed the
legislation which detained people, who came to this country seeking asylum.They
did it for political reasons. They wanted to protect the so-called Cambodian
peace plan that had been worked up by Gareth Evans.
I couldn't ignore what was happening in the refugee area.
When you think of Woomera, set up with those canvas tents and not air
conditioning - people put out there with little children in 46, 48, 50
degree Celsius heat. It was just appalling. I got
involved when I realized that the same things were happening at Marybinong.
I was contacted by a member of the Palestinian community, because a Palestinian
man had disappeared. He and I together eventually
found out this man was being held in solitary confinement for 7 months
at Marybinong. The Department and the Detention Centre hid that for 2
months - then we found out.
In the end we got him out. Those
sorts of things open your eyes to what is happening. There is a public
face here of a democratic country with a good economy, where people are
doing fine. And then there is an underside.
I see the role of the Left to find the underside - because
it is often well hidden - bringing into public awareness and fighting
for the people who are chained to the underside. Whether
it is workers, whether it is asylum seekers or refugees who now have 2nd
class rights in this country, whether it is women who are denied equality
and equity, whoever it is - there are goups of people who miss out. Our
society is predicated on winners. They don't want to worry about
the losers.
The refugee issue has taken all of us into dark places.
We have seen a side of our country that I think many of us couldn't believe
existed. We have witnessed conditions for people that cause us shame.I
think that is why people are fighting so hard. The politicians and the
neo-liberal economic rationalists would like to forget about refugees,
but it won't go away.If we look at the media in
this country we are ill served. We have a Packer/Murdoch press who are
actively merchandising a neo-liberal economic rationalist agenda. Because
it is a democracy, there are bits and pieces here and there which will
reflect an anti-war position or will question privatisation or will question
the refugee policy, but on the whole the press it solidly merchandising
this agenda.
We have the public broadcasting corporation - the ABC
- who is being attacked. We have seen the way in which those attacks are
underming their confidence to be independent. 17.000
hours have been spent examining tapes of broadcast material over the war
to justify Senator Alston's position that the ABC is predjudiced. It seems
that when the neo-liberal economic rationalists are losing, they can't
even acknowledge that.Most of the people in Australia
were opposed to going to war in Iraq. Even when war commenced, still more
than half were opposed to it and nothing that has happened since then
has made them change their minds.
That war has not made the world safer. There has been
a lot of spin-doctoring about the reasons why we went to war. But there
are enough intelligent people in this country - even though they are informed
by this biased media - who have come to their own conclusions. That
again is the role of the left, the dissidents, the activists in our society.
To stimulate people to look outside the arguments put before them and
to come to intelligent conclusions.
At the moment I am working with the Victorian Peace Network.
I am also the national spokesperson for the Greens for refugees, but even
if I weren't, I see myself as one of the many refugee activists. Some
of us are aligned to groups and some of us are not. We are all in communication
through email. This is a campaign that has been connected through email.
Recently I went to the Rural Australians for Refugees
conference in Albury. There I met people Ihad been talking to for the
last two and a half to three years by email and on the telephone. I met
them face to face. It was fantastic.There are a
lot of us who have become friends but never met each other, because of
our concern for the refugees.
We often talk about what activists do for causes and
for groups, but I think we sometimes forget what they do for us. The asylum
seekers, in coming to this country, have allowed us to see another way
- another view of life. They have also allowed
us to see at first hand the incredible strength that people have to struggle
and fight back. They give us an example of how we must struggle.
For many Australians life has been fairly easy. We come
up against these people who have faced a death struggle. They really can
inspire us and show us ways to endure - because that is what we have to
do. So I think we need to remember, as activists
involved in struggles and fights for others, what these people are giving
back to us. It is more than a 50-50 exchange.
Also, I would say there are more women than men working
as activists in the refugee movement. That may come about because women
have a tendency to see the humanity in people first and the politics and
other things second. We are not only doing this
for the asylum seekers. We are also doing it for ourselves, because if
we allow a political situation to exist in this country where one vulnerable
group is picked off, we then are allowing the next vulnerable group to
be picked off too - and so on.
Another group I am involved with is the Civil Rights
Network. This, I think, is a really important work. What
we are seeing in the reaction to terrorism is the Australian Government
winding back our democratic rights. I believe it is a great excuse for
them to curtail the rights of the population.
Increasingly they are introducing policies which are
not to our benefit. They are to the benefit of corporations. That means
people are going to respond - they are going to react. A
lot of the legislation being introduced at the moment is legislation curtailing
people's rights. In effect, what they are doing is criminalizing dissent.
They are criminalizing protest. We activists need
to remember that we will be the first to go!
Just one example. In the paper today the State Government
has reacted with legislation to protect property developers. This is a
group who, you would think, is doing well in a development driven state.
But no, we have to protect them more. It is almost
laughable, really. We have reached the stage where people don't see the
joke in it anymore. They are so used to seeing governments protecting
corporations, private companies and finance.
If we think about it, and that is another issue for us
as a community, who does the government have the strongest, deepest and
most intimate relationship with?
It is not with the people.
It is not with the grassroots.
It is not with the community - it is with the corporations. The directors,
the CEO's are the ones they sit down to lunch with. The are the ones they
dine with at night and socialize with and whose interests are being protected.
Civil rights, human rights, workers' rights and the peace
movement. They are the four areas I work in. But you can't do everything.
Annie once said to me
"you have to focus on where you will be most effective".
But when you are an activist, you just see so much. It
is as if a lens is lifted from your eyes so you actually see the injustice.
You see things happening that are going to lead to injustice and you want
to engage with it.
I am trying to stay within clear paramaters, but of course,
I sometimes get a call from somebody about something and I may have something
useful in my toolbag. I see activists as
having a bag of tools. We all have different bags of tools - this is why
it is good to work together. I think it has been very encouraging to see,
over the past few years, that people are working together more, putting
their political differences to one side to focus on the concerns they
share and to work together.
That has worked very well in the Victorian Peace Network.
There may be forty or fifty of us sitting around the table. There are
people from churches, from left-wing groups, from student groups, from
ethnic groups, from other community groups and from the unions - all sitting
together trying to work out a way to oppose a government decision to take
us to a war that we knew was unjust. This also
happened in the Fairwear campaign. You could go to a protest and
find, say, a Christian brother holding the banner at one end and someone
from a far-left political group holding the banner at the other end.
I think we need to see more of that.
"War will
exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the
same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today.":
John F. Kennedy