UPN Development Status


Concept Document

Summary

A Laser Modem (based on this  115200 bps laser transceiver ) with a 450 metre range was developed and a small neighbourhood network established using these.  Fairly frequent (typ. monthly) realignment was necessary with all but very short links. This was a major irritation. Some neighbours would realign unaided if the error was at their end. Others just gave up. The network was disassembled after 6 months. We concluded laser links were impractical for most people.

Wireless data transceivers of useful speed, range and cost are now available, and others are working on networks similar in concept to the UPN.
 

August 2002 update

Software based wireless data transceivers and other technical advances will make self-scaling high-bandwidth mesh networks practical.

The following letter appeared in a Slashdot discussion. It describes the situation and the possibilities.

{start  of quote}

After listening to the 2 HOUR stream... (Score:2)
          by Alsee on Sunday June 02, @02:03PM (#3626980)
          (User #515537 Info | http://slashdot.org/)

It seems clear many posts are off the mark.

          There were two main subjects. Software radio and how networking affects spectrum capacity. Note that this has
          little or nothing to do with UWB (ultrawideband).

          (1) Software radio: This technology is still expensive, but costs are dropping rapidly. Normal radios are hardware
          designed for specific tasks, work at a specific frequency band, use fixed modulation schemes, and fixed energy
          levels. A software radio does all the work with a CPU. Just load up a new program and all aspects of the device are
          upgradeable. One device can work as a digital or analog cellphone using US or european protocall, or any future
          protocall. It can be reprogramed as a CB, TV, Walkie-talkie, HAM radio, beeper, intercom, 802.11, or bluetooth
          device. Heck, you could leave it on your dashboard as a police-radar detector. New protocalls can be downloaded
          on-the-fly. You can then upgrade the system without replacing $billions of obsolete hardware. Bandwidth
          can also be dynamically allocated were it is needed. Much radio capacity currently goes to waste - it's like
          reserving 15% of your bandwith for browsing, 10% for streaming audio, 20% for video, 20% for games, 5% for
          email, 15% for FTP, etc. Current regulations are an obstacle to software radio.

(2) Second was an analysis of the obsolete paradigm of treating radio spectrum as "property". This was based on a
          fundamental result that data capacity is equal to bandwidth, and that bandwidth is limited. The more devices in
          the system, the less data capacity each device can get. Try to use 1000 cellphones (or wireless laptops) in one
          place and the system dies. This is a result of analyzing a simple point-to-point or broadcast system. New systems
          working as a network throw the old rules out the window. With the proper protocalls each device added to the
          system can increase total capacity enough so that with more devices in the system, each device still gets the
          same data capacity. Data capacity per device is no longer a limited resource. It is also based on an obsolete
          interpertation of interference. In current radios, when two signals at the same frequency arrive at the same place
          there is interference and the information is lost. This is merely a flaw of current designs. Using "smart" antennas
          multiple signals at the same frequence can be received without interference. It turns out that multi-path
          "interference" can actually increases capacity, as does motion. It also allows lower power levels to be used. These
          results fly in the face of traditional electrical engineering, but they are solid physics/mathematical results. (Watch
          the presentaion [fcc.gov] before you argue that I'm wrong.)

          In the next serveral years we may be in for a radical change in the way radio is used and regulated. These changes
          will enable "always-on" wearable networked computing.

{end of quote}