![]() |
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA | |||
| Tel +613 9589 1802 | Tel +61429176725 | 18 Anita Street | BEAUMARIS VIC 3193 | |
| Fax +613
9589 1680 |
ggd@netspace.net.au | www.prsa .org.au | 25th August 2007 | |
|
TASMANIAN HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
POLLS 1913-2006: INCIDENCE OF EXHAUSTED VOTES |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
NOTE
1: Data below was obtained from the Report to
the Parliament by the Chief Electoral Officer, which includes the
following clarification: "The figures in the above table represent the
number of votes that were discarded during the actual count because
there was no further choice marked on them that could be effective. These votes do not, in all cases,
indicate unrepresented electors, because many of them had contributed
to the election of successful candidates before they became exhausted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
NOTE
2: The overall
percentages for 1925,1928 and 1931 were calculated from figures in the
above Reports, but differ unaccountably from the overall percentages
shown separately there, which were 4.0%, 2.9% and 2.3% respectively. The median percentage
of exhausted votes over all 29 elections is 3.3% as shown below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
NOTE 3: In the 1948 debate on PR for the Senate, Dame Enid Lyons, Liberal MHR for Darwin (renamed Braddon in 1954), a Tasmanian Opposition member, pointed out to the Attorney-General, Dr H.V.Evatt, that Tasmania had never had a requirement, of the type that his Commonwealth Electoral Bill 1948 unfortunately succeeded in providing for Senate PR, that voters must mark more preferences than the number of vacancies to be filled. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year |
Seats per Div. |
No. of Prefs. to be marked |
Bass |
Braddon (Darwin till 1954) |
Denison |
Franklin |
Lyons |
TASMANIA |
||||||||||||
|
Total Valid Votes |
Exhausted Votes |
Total Valid Votes |
Exhausted Votes |
Total Valid Votes |
Exhausted Votes |
Total Valid Votes |
Exhausted Votes |
Total Valid Votes |
Exhausted Votes |
Total Valid Votes |
Exhausted Votes |
|||||||||
|
No. |
Percent |
No. |
Percent |
No. |
Percent |
No. |
Percent |
No. |
Percent |
No. |
Percent |
|||||||||
| 2006 |
5 |
5 |
60699 |
984 |
1.6% |
63309 |
526 |
0.8% |
61538 |
2135 |
3.5% |
63957 |
1065 |
1.7% |
60119 |
540 |
0.9% |
309622 |
5250 |
1.7% |
|
2002 |
5 |
5 |
58568 |
1093 |
1.9% |
60838 |
1153 |
1.9% |
60235 |
4641 |
7.7% |
60525 |
1937 |
3.2% |
56304 |
2392 |
4.3% |
296470 |
11216 |
3.8% |
|
1998 |
5 |
5 |
58614 |
3423 |
5.8% |
56126 |
2626 |
4.7% |
59390 |
2676 |
4.5% |
58864 |
2459 |
4.2% |
61684 |
1902 |
3.1% |
294678 |
13086 |
4.4% |
|
1996 |
7 |
7 |
58782 |
767 |
1.3% |
56792 |
1624 |
2.9% |
59618 |
914 |
1.5% |
58554 |
2479 |
4.2% |
60925 |
1837 |
3.0% |
294671 |
7621 |
2.6% |
|
1992 |
7 |
7 |
55507 |
2016 |
3.6% |
57025 |
2925 |
5.1% |
54707 |
4355 |
8.0% |
59090 |
1809 |
3.1% |
58893 |
1549 |
2.6% |
285222 |
12654 |
4.4% |
|
1989 |
7 |
7 |
53915 |
624 |
1.2% |
54529 |
3213 |
5.9% |
54257 |
347 |
0.6% |
55581 |
2060 |
3.7% |
54855 |
1044 |
1.9% |
273137 |
7288 |
2.7% |
|
1986 |
7 |
7 |
51101 |
763 |
1.5% |
51673 |
155 |
0.3% |
51711 |
400 |
0.8% |
50479 |
515 |
1.0% |
51197 |
562 |
1.1% |
256161 |
2395 |
0.9% |
|
1982 |
7 |
7 |
50186 |
1209 |
2.4% |
48590 |
2263 |
4.7% |
49601 |
1371 |
2.8% |
51410 |
1846 |
3.6% |
50309 |
1529 |
3.0% |
250096 |
8218 |
3.3% |
|
1979 |
7 |
7 |
48367 |
619 |
1.3% |
46039 |
2127 |
4.6% |
48376 |
1494 |
3.1% |
48766 |
658 |
1.3% |
47736 |
2271 |
4.8% |
239284 |
7169 |
3.0% |
|
1976 |
7 |
7 |
43447 |
251 |
0.6% |
49970 |
1470 |
2.9% |
46831 |
1142 |
2.4% |
47300 |
1369 |
2.9% |
47582 |
1742 |
3.7% |
235130 |
5974 |
2.5% |
|
1972 |
7 |
3 |
37648 |
1081 |
2.9% |
41778 |
617 |
1.5% |
40311 |
1019 |
2.5% |
38714 |
1466 |
3.8% |
39819 |
2550 |
6.4% |
198270 |
6733 |
3.4% |
|
1969 |
7 |
3 |
36642 |
941 |
2.6% |
39361 |
1191 |
3.0% |
39362 |
1147 |
2.9% |
35619 |
919 |
2.6% |
38339 |
799 |
2.1% |
189323 |
4997 |
2.6% |
|
1964 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176591 |
7832 |
4.4% |
|
1959 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160743 |
6094 |
3.8% |
|
1956 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159325 |
4975 |
3.1% |
|
1955 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156479 |
4019 |
2.6% |
|
1950 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145944 |
2654 |
1.8% |
|
1948 |
6 |
3 |
26731 |
163 |
0.6% |
29272 |
1830 |
6.3% |
27716 |
1329 |
4.8% |
33142 |
2523 |
7.6% |
25861 |
1006 |
3.9% |
142722 |
6851 |
4.8% |
|
1946 |
6 |
3 |
24167 |
817 |
3.4% |
27333 |
1490 |
5.5% |
25782 |
1175 |
4.6% |
28887 |
2058 |
7.1% |
23021 |
1875 |
8.1% |
129190 |
7415 |
5.7% |
|
1941 |
6 |
3 |
22632 |
1097 |
4.8% |
25310 |
420 |
1.7% |
24754 |
575 |
2.3% |
25640 |
915 |
3.6% |
22354 |
186 |
0.8% |
120690 |
3193 |
2.6% |
|
1937 |
6 |
3 |
23920 |
974 |
4.1% |
24684 |
194 |
0.8% |
24278 |
1025 |
4.2% |
25789 |
323 |
1.3% |
22792 |
311 |
1.4% |
121463 |
2827 |
2.3% |
|
1934 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116767 |
5350 |
4.6% |
|
1931 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108894 |
5350 |
4.9% |
|
1928 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88706 |
2460 |
2.8% |
|
1925 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75567 |
2548 |
3.4% |
|
1922 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67918 |
2607 |
3.8% |
|
1919 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68307 |
2246 |
3.3% |
|
1916 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74636 |
2900 |
3.9% |
|
1913 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68777 |
3198 |
4.6% |
|
1912 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73886 |
|
|
|
1909 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48960 |
|
|
|
Median percentage of
exhausted votes over the 29 Tasmanian Assembly elections from 1913 to
2006: |
3.3% |
|||||||||||||||||||