|
|
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
SOCIETY OF |
|||
|
Tel +613 9589 1802 |
Tel +61429176725 |
|
BEAUMARIS VIC 3193 |
|
|
Fax +613 9589 1680 |
|
|
8th August 2007 |
|
|
INADVISABILITY OF IMPOSING CONSTRAINTS IN PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION ELECTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
Examples
of Imposition of Constraints: An early example of a
constraint applied to override and distort a winner-take-all outcome is
the provision in the 12th Amendment
to the U.S. Constitution that requires that an elector is
constrained in his or her votes for President and Vice-President by
having to vote, in at least one of those ballots, for a candidate that
is resident in a state other than the one in which he or she is
resident. More recent examples include the constraint that Section 28(a)
of the Constitution of the
Liberal Party of Australia places on the sex of the two
Vice-Presidents of its
Federal Council, whereby one must be a male and one a female. The
Australian Labor Party also has fixed a minimum percentage of safe
parliamentary seats for which female candidates must be endorsed. As
elections also include the nomination process, constraints on voters'
wishes also appear there in the form of the term limits, fortunately
not favoured in Australia,
imposed by the 22nd
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. |
| Confusion about What
Constitutes Representation: There is, possibly based on the
secondary rather than the primary dictionary definition of the word "representation",
an
unfortunate confusion
between the representation of voters' opinions and the representation
of their definable characteristics. That confusion leads to a
belief
in some quarters that the outcome of an election should be more
predetermined than it would be if it were left to the voters to the
greatest extent possible. This confusion leads to proposals for a
requirement that there should be an equal number of
males and females
in parliaments despite voters having other priorities, as evidenced
by
their votes. This attitude of constraining voters completely overlooks
the fact that, in some circumstances, or for a particular election, a
large number of male voters might prefer to have females as their
representatives. |
| Preferable Means of
Encouraging Diversity: A far
fairer way of encouraging diversity in a representative body is to
couple the maximum use of a quota-preferential system of proportional
representation with the minimum use of devices, such as the history of
Australian Senate
ballot-paper designs demonstrates, that attempt to
arbitrarily or subtly distort voters' preferences. This includes Group
Voting Tickets, and
unnecessary formality
provisions for the full marking of all preferences rather
than a requirement that a minimum number of preferences equal to the
number of positions to be filled is required. There is great benefit in
positive measures for voter-controlled diversity such as Robson
Rotation, and the provision on ballot-papers of even-handed
information
such as the requirement of Section
74(3B)(b) of Victoria's Electoral
Act 2002 for Legislative Council
proportional representation elections for printing on the ballot-paper
against each candidate's name the locality at which each candidate is
enrolled. It is desirable that ballot-papers should also include a
statement of the
vote-counting system to be used in determining the result of the vote,
so that voters are made aware of how their vote is translated into
seats. |
* * * * * * * |