Future Options for cattle grazing in
the Alpine National Park The Nationals (Victoria) 1. Portfolios Sustainability and Environment The benefits of cattle grazing in the Alpine National Park are numerous and worthy of consideration. The Nationals believe that the constituent members of the Alpine Grazing Taskforce should remain open-minded and objective in their assessment of cattle grazing in the Alpine National Park. For this reason, the Nationals would urge the taskforce to give due consideration to the valid case for the preservation of alpine grazing in Victoria's high country. The Nationals support the renewal of all alpine grazing licences for a further seven years in accordance with the Alpine National Park Act 1989. They do so in the recognition that alpine grazing licences underpin many of the social, economic and environmental values currently found in the Alpine National Park and surrounding area. The Nationals fully support the principle of controlled and managed access to the Alpine National Park, in the recognition that public land benefits greatly from the presence of responsible land using communities. Collectively, Victoria's cattlemen clearly represent such a community - in both their past and present use of the Victorian Alps, the cattlemen have continually acted to ensure the ongoing welfare of the alpine environment and have consistently demonstrated their deep concern for the high country. The variety of benefits arising from alpine grazing will be discussed in this submission, as will the impacts that are commonly thought to derive from the practice. An analysis of cattle grazing in the greater context of public land management will also be included, as will various recommendations for the improvement of current land management practice in the Alpine National Park. The Nationals recognise that in establishing a caucus taskforce to review alpine grazing, the current State government has created an excellent opportunity to reassess the current regime of land management in the Alpine National Park. To capitalise on this opportunity, the government must conduct an immediate review of current land management practice in the Alpine National Park with the ultimate aim of developing a novel management regime that can protect the considerable natural and cultural heritage of the Alps in symbiosis. The Nationals recognise the need for a system of public land management in Victoria that is capable of bringing various stakeholders together in common projects of active land management. Only by developing such a system can the current government demonstrate its commitment to ensuring the sustainable management of public land in Victoria. The scope for this to occur shall be explored in this submission, as it represents a positive way forward for land management in this state.
It is recommended that the Alpine Grazing Advisory Taskforce endorse: 1. That the Government renews all current alpine grazing licences for
a further seven years, according to the Alpine National Parks Act, 1989
The fact that alpine grazing contributes to the economic and social wellbeing of the North-Eastern and Gippsland communities of Victoria is indisputable. The traditional practice of grazing cattle in the Alpine National Park is the source of pride for many people living in the alpine area. Consequently, the loss of alpine grazing licences could be expected to cause considerable sadness and significant social dislocation within the local communities of the alpine area For the families who hold grazing licences in the Alpine National Park
and surrounding areas, alpine grazing represents far more that a simple
means to an economic gain. It is a culturally and spiritually important
practice that unites a community in the collective effort to maintain
the tradition and history of their forebears. The loss of grazing licences
would have a profound effect on this grazing community, not to mention
the many in the wider Victorian community who value the ongoing tradition
of alpine grazing. The benefits of cattle grazing in the Alpine National Park extend far beyond the local level. Alpine grazing provides a vital and accessible link to Australia's rich pioneering history. As an ongoing tradition, the practice continues to provide a marker of a uniquely Australian cultural identity. In the past, the tradition of alpine grazing has been celebrated at a host of public events including the 2003 Federation celebrations and the opening of the Sydney Olympics. On these occasions, the public's overwhelmingly positive response to the sight of cattlemen mounted on horseback has provided some indication of the pride and respect with which many view the tradition. The termination of this tradition would most certainly result in the loss of some of our nation's most valuable living heritage; a loss that would be mourned by the countless Victorians who desire the conservation of the history and tradition that is tied to the ongoing practice of cattle grazing in the Victorian Alps. Indeed, the desire to see Australia's unique history and culture preserved in perpetuity can explain the considerable support for continued alpine grazing among people who live in urban communities. For these individuals, a decision to renew grazing licences in the Alpine National Park would be nothing but positive. The cultural and historical benefits of alpine grazing will be discussed in section six of this submission. The benefits that derive from alpine grazing also extend to the alpine environment. Victoria's cattlemen are a sustainable and responsible presence in the Victorian high country. The cattle that they take into the Alpine National Park are few, with stocking rates on alpine runs now at record low levels. These cattle are actively controlled by the cattlemen and, in reality, graze only on a very small proportion of the entire alpine area. Compared to other, more intensive uses of alpine land, the impacts of alpine grazing are negligible. The current allocation of grazing licences ensures that many areas of the Alpine National Park remain ungrazed by cattle. This situation creates an opportunity for future large?scale studies of the response of different alpine ecosystems to a range of land uses. Such far-sighted and broad-reaching studies are required to gain an empirically sound and accurate understanding of how the alpine environment responds to grazing. The cattlemen themselves have long possessed a comprehensive knowledge of the alpine environment and its unique ecology, by virtue of their ongoing engagement with the high country landscape. Members of the cattlemen community also possess a complex understanding of land management as it has traditionally been practiced in the Victorian Alps. At present, this wealth of local knowledge is being undervalued by the agencies responsible for land management in Victoria. A transition to a forward?thinking land management regime in the Victorian Alps could see this knowledge become a valuable asset to Park's Victoria and DSE staff. Indeed, there currently exists a significant potential for future conservation efforts on Victoria's public land to be made both inclusive and cooperative, bringing together a range of motivated and willing stakeholders in a progressive approach to land management. The scope for this to occur in the Alpine National Park will be explored further in this submission, in section seven. All recommendations in this submission have been developed to ensure that the significant and complex environmental requirements of the Alpine National Park are balanced with the requirement that the alpine grazing tradition in Victoria, and its associated economic, environmental, social, cultural and historical benefits, are preserved in perpetuity. 5. The Economic Benefits of Alpine Grazing Alpine Grazing makes a direct and significant contribution to local economies in the North-Eastern and Gippsland regions of Victoria. When Victoria's reputation as a premium tourism destination and a source of clean, green produce is also taken into account, the economic benefits of alpine grazing may be observed to extend to the state as a whole. In their voluntary service to the Victorian community, the mountain cattlemen contribute to the efficiency of land management in the Alpine National Park. This largely unrecognised contribution represents a direct economic benefit to the state, and should be acknowledged as such by the Victorian Government. In the following sections, the economic benefits of alpine grazing briefly introduced here will be discussed in greater detail. 5.1 Victorian agriculture and the value of alpine grazing 5.2 Cattlemen and tourism in the Victorian high country In the course of the annual grazing season, Victorian cattlemen will generally visit one or more of the traditional cattlemen's huts that are located throughout the high country. In maintaining these huts, the cattlemen perform a vital service to the Victorian community. Providing shelter to bush walkers, an essential refuge for cross country skiers and a fascinating historical insight for tourists, these huts are some of the Alpine National Park's greatest assets. In recent history, cattlemen's huts have been the focus of considerable attention, with the Victorian High Country Huts Association (VHCHA) forming in the aftermath of the devastating fires of 2003. This association of volunteers has come together with the aim of maintaining existing cattlemen's huts and rebuilding those huts destroyed in the fires. This committed group of individuals represent the majority of Victorians who value the cattlemen's huts of the high country. Their hard work and dedication mirrors that of the cattlemen, who for decades have provided a valuable service to the Victorian community in voluntarily maintaining a network of historically important buildings. Their efforts in doing so have more than once saved lives. In addition to providing shelter, cattlemen's huts are regularly stocked with emergency food supplies and firewood. These life saving supplies do not simply appear out of nowhere - it is the cattlemen of Victoria who supply them. This voluntary service to the Victorian community is indicative of the Cattlemen's responsible use of the Alpine National Park and should be acknowledged as such by the Victorian government. Maintenance of huts is not the only service that the mountain cattlemen provide to the Victorian community. Members of the cattlemen community also regularly contribute to the management of Alpine National Park assets such as roads and trails, keeping them open for the benefit of other park users, such as bushwalkers. History has repeatedly shown the cattlemen's willingness to assist with search and rescue operations, weed and pest animal control, and fire fighting efforts. In all of these activities, cattlemen are able to employ their invaluable knowledge of the high country environment to assist Park's Victoria and departmental staff in their service to the Victorian community. Their ability to do so relies on their ongoing engagement with the alpine environment. For many park users, the mere presence of the cattlemen in the high country provides a sense of security and comfort. The services the cattlemen voluntarily provide to Victorian community contribute to the efficiency of land management in the Alpine National Park. As such, they represent a distinct economic benefit to the Victorian government and the state as a whole. The Nationals urge the alpine grazing taskforce to take this and other benefits of alpine grazing into account in their assessment of alpine grazing.
Alpine Grazing in the Victorian high country is a tradition with a rich history and an unquestionable cultural significance. As newspaper polling and community surveys have demonstrated, numerous Victorians support the continuation of alpine grazing in the Alpine National Park. Many have do so in the recognition that a sustainable level of alpine grazing provides the community with a tangible and continuing link to Australia's past. For these people, the conservation of the significant cultural and historical heritage of Victoria's alpine grazing tradition is of paramount importance. The preservation of a cultural and historically important tradition will prove to be a definite benefit of any decision to renew alpine grazing licences. This benefit clearly justifies the continuation of a sustainable level of cattle grazing in the Alpine National Park and will be discussed in detail in the following section. 6.1 The living heritage of the alpine grazing tradition Compared to other parts of the world, Australia is a relatively young nation. Nevertheless, Australia does have a number of historically significant traditions that are both highly valued by the general community and widely regarded as important markers of national identity. From the Royal Flying Doctor's Service and the surf lifesavers of our coasts, to the aboriginal dreaming and the mountain cattlemen of Victoria, Australia can boast many examples of living heritage ? traditions that are valued precisely because they have continued into the present day. As some aspects of Australian history have vanished from the everyday world into the history books and journals of our time, certain ongoing traditions such as alpine grazing have kept alive aspects of the fascinating and valuable history of our nation. These ongoing traditions provide the community with an immediate and accessible link to Australia's past, and enable the transmission of invaluable cultural knowledge into the future. They are also key to the existence of a sense of shared national identity in Australia. In providing a tangible link to the nation's history, traditions such as alpine grazing contribute to a sense that, as a community, Australians share a heritage that forms the foundation stone of our collective cultural identity. A brief account of the history of alpine grazing in Victoria's high country, and an analysis of the iconic status of 'the mountain cattleman' in the Australian psyche, can provide some insight into the widespread community support for the continuation of alpine grazing. Both will be provided below. 6.2 Alpine grazing as an important link to Victoria's past Examination of the historical record of alpine grazing reveals a practice that has continued for some 170 years in the Victorian high plains. Whilst the practice has been modified over the years to reflect knowledge developments and changes in land management priorities, alpine grazing as it occurs today provides an active, ongoing record of some of our nation's most fascinating history. As early as 1834, cattlemen from the Monaro district of New South Wales
arrived in the Omeo area in search of new pasture for their stock (Holth
1980). Between the 1830s and the 1860s, squatters in the Victorian Alps
were permitted to establish tenure over areas of crown land in the high
country, receiving licences upon application to the government. Nevertheless,
initial exploration of the Victorian Alps was gradual, as the unpredictable
weather conditions and rough terrain of the mountains regularly made passage
through the mountains a difficult task. In the early years of alpine grazing there was little control of stock numbers in the high country. In times of severe drought, Victoria's high country would become home to huge numbers of sheep and cattle, brought to the high country from regions as distant of the Riverina (Bennett 1995). The grazing licences issued by the government held little currency at such times, as other pastoralists joined the cattlemen in their quest to feed their starving stock. Inevitably, this led to competition between graziers for access to areas most valued as quality grazing pasture. In this context, overstocking was often a reality and the alpine environment suffered some damage in the form of soil erosion and vegetation loss. The introduction of the rabbit only exacerbated this damage, causing severe erosion and destruction of some native vegetation in the alpine area (Holth 1980). This situation was to change in the early 1900s. As a fledgling conservation movement begun to lobby for restrictions to be placed on alpine grazing, the Victorian government and cattlemen community came to an agreement - controls were to limit the extent to which the Alps were grazed. Sheep were excluded from the high country and tighter regulations were introduced to control the numbers of cattle that were taken up to alpine leases. Preliminary measures were also introduced to limit the duration of the summer grazing period. As official land management strategies have evolved, successive Victorian governments have initiated further withdrawals of cattle from certain defined areas of the high country. An understanding of the current limits that are placed on alpine grazing is crucial to an accurate appreciation of contemporary alpine grazing. The Alpine Grazing Taskforce must recognise that alpine grazing, as it is currently practiced, cannot not pose a threat to the alpine environment as the stocking levels prescribed by alpine grazing licenses are inherently low. Whilst most cattlemen would concur that stocking levels in the Victorian Alps were excessive in the initial years of alpine grazing, the cattlemen community is now in unanimous agreement that the current stocking levels of alpine leases are sustainable. In fact, after the 170 years in which grazing has occurred in the Victorian high country, the alpine environment is viable and healthy - so much so that the Victorian government has deemed the Victorian Alps as an area suitable to managed as a National Park. At present only 56 licenses to graze cattle remain in the Alpine National Park. As each of these licences only supports a small number of stock, the total number of cattle in the park is inherently limited. In ecological terms, the numbers of cattle are such they only have a minor influence on the growth of alpine vegetation. Like any animal, cattle taken to the high country will inevitably have an effect on the environment in which they live. However, it is fallacious to portray this impact as a form of permanent damage. A journey to the Victorian high country can clarify this point - throughout the varied landscapes of the Alpine National Park it is indeed a truly difficult task to identify areas that have been significantly and permanently damaged by cattle. The long history of alpine grazing has seen the mountain cattlemen modify their grazing operations to reflect knowledge developments in the areas of cattle behaviour and environmental change. Whilst stocking levels are much reduced in the contemporary situation, the manner in which the cattlemen conduct their grazing operations preserves many of the traditions that have been passed down through history. When considered in context, the current scope of cattle grazing in the Alpine National Park achieves an excellent balance between the need to preserve the cultural and historical heritage of the park, and the necessity that stocking levels are kept to a level that is ecologically sustainable. 6.3 Protecting the living heritage of Australia The continuation of the alpine grazing tradition over the years has enabled the mountain cattlemen community to preserve and build upon a body of knowledge first established by their predecessors, over 170 years ago. This body of knowledge incorporates a valuable understanding of the ecology and geography of the high country landscape, and an appreciation of how successive generations of people have modified the alpine environment in the course of various activities. The existence of such knowledge is beneficial for various reasons explained below. By virtue of their understanding of the geography of the alpine landscape, the cattlemen are well positioned to assist with search and rescue and fire-fighting efforts in the Alpine National Park and surrounding area. In the past, this has saved many a life in the high country. The renewal of alpine grazing licences will ensure that the cattlemen community can retain a strong presence in the landscape and continue providing assistance to the Victorian community in the event of life-threatening emergencies. The cattlemen's knowledge of how a history of human use has changed the alpine environment also enables them to pinpoint pest and weed problems, monitor adverse human behaviour and alert authorities to the accumulation of fuel loadings in the bush. The latter point is of particular relevance to contemporary policymakers. In the wake of the devastating fires of 2003, many people, including the Emergency Services Commissioner of Victoria, Bruce Esplin, recognised the need for land management authorities to place a greater emphasis on the prevention and mitigation of fires through increased fuel reduction burning. Another recommendation of the Esplin report suggested that official agencies responsible for fire management on public land move to ensure that local knowledge is incorporated into tactical and strategic fire management. To comprehensively follow up the accepted recommendations of the Esplin report, the Victorian government should immediately begin consultation with local communities living in the vicinity of the Victorian Alps. There is little doubt that if this were to occur the government and the relevant land management agencies would quickly realise the value of the local knowledge of Victoria's mountain cattlemen. Many of the cattlemen alive today have an excellent memory of the era in which they were able to conduct controlled burns on their alpine leases. Many others have been long?term volunteers on local CFA brigades. These individuals possess a valuable knowledge of the behaviour of fire in the alpine landscape and a comprehensive understanding of the intrinsic relationship between fuel loadings and fire intensity. In enabling the cattlemen to remain in the high country, the current government would ensure that these individuals will retain a knowledge of the high country that is unparalleled amongst other users and administrators of the Alpine National Park. The government, Parks Victoria and the emergency services of Victoria stand to benefit greatly from the knowledge of traditional controlled burning practices that is retained to this day by members of the cattlemen community. The Nationals recommend that the current government act immediately to source this valuable knowledge through an ongoing program of consultation, subsequently incorporating it into fire prevention and control strategies.
The continuing presence of mountain cattlemen in the Victorian high country is of considerable benefit to the alpine environment. By virtue of their long?term engagement with the high country landscape, the cattlemen of Victoria possess an understanding of the alpine environment that enables them to contribute to the sustainable management of the Alpine National Park in a variety of ways. The Nationals believe that the current government must acknowledge this fact and investigate the option of increasing the involvement of land users such as the mountain cattlemen in programs of conservation and public land management. The development of a new and inclusive management regime for the Alpine National Park would constitute a far?sighted strategy that could ensure that programs of responsible and active land management are established to preserve the environmental integrity of the Victorian Alps into the future. There is little doubt that the Bracks government would be well rewarded for developing such a strategy, as the majority of Victorians would be likely to support any move to improve current, flawed land management regimes in the Alpine National Park. In the following section, the benefits that alpine grazing bring to the Alpine National Park will be explored, as will the scope for these benefits to be maximised in future programs of alpine land management. 7.1 The cattlemen community as a barometer of environmental change Just as they are adept at recognising weeds, the cattlemen of Victoria are also well attuned to the signs of pest animals in the alpine landscape. In the last century, pest animals have emerged to become a serious threat to the biodiversity of the alpine landscape. Indeed, the proliferation of wild dog numbers in the Alpine National Park has recently attracted a considerable amount of public attention, as local communities have reacted with horror at the wholesale destruction of domestic animals and native fauna by these feral creatures. From the extent of the wild dog problem in the alpine area it is clear that the current efforts to control the problem are having little effect. Without an immediate rethink of strategy, the government and public of Victoria will be left watching from the sidelines as feral dogs continue their wholesale slaughter of native and domestic animal populations. If licensed to assist parks staff in efforts to eradicate pest animals, the mountain cattlemen community could become Parks Victoria's most valuable asset in the battle to stem the proliferation of feral animals in the Alpine National Park. However, for this to occur, the ongoing presence of the cattlemen in the alpine landscape will need to be protected in perpetuity. In the short term, this necessitates the immediate renewal of alpine grazing licences for a further seven years. 7.4 The risk of fire in the Alpine National Park Since 1989 and the transition to national park's management, fire regimes have been altered markedly in the alpine environment. During this time, the mountain cattlemen, along with members of local communities in the alpine area and other users of the Alpine National Park, have become increasingly vocal about the need for increased fuel reduction burning within the alpine area. For the cattlemen, the increased risk of a massively destructive fire that has been created by reduced fuel reduction has been obvious for over a decade. Attuned to change within the alpine environment, Victoria's cattlemen could easily identify the accumulation of fuel loadings in the lead up to last year's fires. Indeed, over the past decade, members of the cattlemen community have often been the most vocal advocates of the need for increased fuel reduction in the Victorian Alps. Their awareness of the risk of extreme fires is clearly the consequence of their ongoing engagement with the alpine environment. Many of the older members of the cattlemen community possess a comprehensive knowledge of the fire ecology of the alpine area, having spent a great deal of time engaged in seasonal fuel reduction burning in the alps. Many cattlemen have also gained considerable experience in combating fires as committed members of CFA brigades. For these individuals, the accumulation of fuel loadings in the Alpine National Park was an overwhelming concern and source of anxiety. Sadly, last years massively destructive fires only justified this concern, as they swept through the Alpine National Park destroying all within their wake. Perhaps the biggest tragedy of the 2003 fires was the utter lack of attention that was paid to local concerns prior to the fires. Representatives of Victorian government and Park's Victoria should accept full responsibility for this failure and be more attentive to local concerns about the accumulation of fuel loadings in the Alpine National Park in the future. In the spirit of learning from their mistakes, both the government and Parks Victoria must now follow a key recommendation of the Esplin inquiry and put in place strategies to incorporate local knowledge into programs of fire mitigation and prevention. One valuable source of local knowledge will inevitably be the cattlemen community. Many cattlemen retain their knowledge of traditional controlled burning in the alpine area and possess a willingness to assist contemporary land management agencies in their efforts to conduct fuel reduction programs in the Alps. Renewal of alpine licences will now ensure that the cattlemen can continue their service to the Victorian community in monitoring the accumulation of fuel loadings in the alpine environment and will permit them to provide ongoing assistance in the design and execution of programs of fuel reduction burning in the Victorian Alps. 7.5 The unsuitability of wilderness style management in the Alpine National Park At present, the limited human and financial resources of Parks Victoria and the Department of Environment and Sustainability appears to mitigate their capability to execute effective programs of fuel reduction and pest weed and plant control in the Alpine National Park. This reflects a broader situation across Victoria, in which community concerns are increasingly drawing attention to the significant shortfalls of public land management regimes. In the alpine region, community concerns about land management practices in the Alpine National Park have been evident for some time. Indeed, the palpable sense of fear that has long been evident in alpine communities has only intensified in the past year, as people have come to terms with the destruction wrought by the 2003 fires. Residents of these communities contend that contemporary management regimes in the Alpine National Park are failing to control endemic pest plant and animal populations and the risk of fire brought about by the unchecked growth of fuel loads. These individuals are not alone in their concerns. Scientists and policy advisers are now also joining the call for altered land management regimes in the wake of the destructive fires, contending that immediate human intervention in the alpine environment is not only justifiable, but a vital necessity if we are to prevent further holocaust fires from destroying vast tracts of native flora and fauna. The Nationals share with the Victorian community many of their concerns about the current state of public lands across the state. The party recognises that in announcing a review of alpine grazing licences in the Alpine National Park, the current government has created an excellent opportunity to review current land management in the Victorian Alps. Part of the problem with the existing model of land management in the Alpine National Park is brought about by the misconception that the Victorian Alps can be acceptably be managed as 'wilderness'. In the late 1970's and 1980's, a wave of environmental fervour spread throughout Australia and the industrialised world. The massive popularity of the environmental movement since this time reflects widespread community concerns about the changes that have occurred in natural environments as a result of human action. While it may be characterised by good intentions, the environmental movement of the past has often been fuelled by ideological notions and has frequently failed to grasp the inherent complexity of environmental issues as a consequence. In Australia, the trend towards the wilderness management of National Parks may be seen as a product of a well?intended desire to preserve our nation's natural heritage in perpetuity. However, as people have come to terms with the consequences of wilderness management, there has been a gradual shift away from the guiding principles of such models of management. Increasingly, the principles of active management are coming into favour amongst policymakers and informed conservationists (Russell and Jambrecina 2002). The current management of the Alpine National Park provides an insight into why this shift is occurring. Wilderness management is only suited to environments that have remained relatively free of human intervention throughout history. In the contemporary world, such environments are few, and generally exist at the final frontiers of human habitation - such as the polar extremes of the earth. Areas such as the Alpine National Park have been subject to human intervention for centuries. From aboriginal inhabitation of the Bogong High Plains to the subsequent mining operations, hydroelectricity schemes, intensive tourism use and alpine grazing of the Victorian Alps, the area currently managed as the Alpine National Park has a long history of human intervention. With this human intervention has come many changes to the ecological balance of the alpine environment. Native populations of flora and fauna have changed, fire regimes have been altered and foreign species have been introduced. With continued human management of the environment, none of these factors need represent a severe threat to the biodiversity of the alpine area. However, with the introduction of Wilderness management in areas of the national park, factors such as pest weeds and plants have been permitted to escalate beyond control to become the severe and concerning environmental issues that now pose a threat to the biodiversity of the Victorian Alps. It is naive and irresponsible of the Victorian government to presume that large areas of the Victorian Alps can be simply locked up and left alone. These areas require active management to ensure that the problems that have already been created by human intervention do not threaten the biodiversity and natural values of the Alps. Wilderness management must now be abandoned as a guiding principle of National Park's operations. Instead the Victorian government must move to create new models of public land management that can secure the sustainable management of the Alpine National Park into the future. 7.6 Future Options for land management in the Alpine National Park The need for coordinated and integrating approaches to natural resource
management is increasingly being recognised by a number of commentators
(Downs et. al., Martin and Lockie 1993). In Victoria, where a large amount
of public land is currently managed as national parks and reserves, the
need for novel approaches to natural resource management is significant.
Clearly, the current combined resources of Parks Victoria and the DSE
are insufficient to permit the active and sustainable management of the
Alpine National Park and surrounding area. Unacceptably high fuel loadings,
pest animals and weeds are just some of the problems that now threaten
the biodiversity of the Victorian Alps. A comprehensive solution to these
problems is now required. Under an inclusive model of natural resource management, individuals would be invited to contribute in different ways to the active management of Victoria's natural resources. Whether their role is to provide information to land management agencies, or to provide hands on, ground level assistance to agency staff, all Victorians stand to offer something to the task of actively managing our National Parks and reserves. The Victorian government should be proactive in encouraging public involvement in all aspects of the management of public parks and reserves. An example of inclusive natural resource management that has proved successful is provided by the total catchment management (TCM) approach that has been implemented in the Hunter Valley in NSW (Martin and Lockie 1993). In this approach, catchment managers have successfully provided a framework for the community consultation and have actively developed cooperative projects that have brought various stakeholders together to improve catchment management practices. In the Alpine National Park, a similar approach could see a range of groups with an ongoing interest in the welfare of the alpine environment, brought together in constructive programs of active natural resource management. In bringing together and facilitating effective communication between
different stakeholder groups in the Alpine National Park, the Victorian
government could achieve a host of positive outcomes. For example, the
instigation of greater dialogue between different stakeholder groups could
encourage a greater understanding and tolerance of alpine grazing amongst
those who have long remained ideologically opposed to the practice. Increased
stakeholder communication could also foster greater cooperation between
the different sectors of the Victorian community that desire the conservation
of the significant natural and cultural heritage of the Victorian Alps.
Ultimately, this could see these people become a united front in the effort
to actively manage the natural environment of the Victorian alpine region.
The government should support the development of novel and inclusive management
plans for National Parks. As such, the government should give due consideration
to the joint management plan that has been developed by the Mountain Cattlemen's
Association of Victoria (MCAV).
The impact of cattle in the Alpine National Park is remarkably minor and can in no way justify the removal of cattle from the Alpine National Park. Any human activity within a particular environment will inevitably have an impact on that environment. Within the Alpine National Park, a great number of human activities stand to generate an impact on alpine ecology. Be they bushwalking or four-wheel driving, all visitors to the Alpine National Park will have some kind of effect on the alpine environment. When formulating sound land management policy, it is the role of governments and decision?makers to distinguish the degree to which different activities will have an impact on the natural environment. When an impact is minimal and non-cumulative, the activity may be regarded as sustainable. However, when the impact of an activity is cumulative and leads to the ongoing degradation of the natural environment, the activity may be regarded as unsustainable detrimental to the natural environment. In relation to alpine grazing, this distinction is critical. Alpine grazing, when managed effectively, fits unquestionably into the category of a sustainable practice. While the practice inevitably does have an impact on the alpine environment, this impact can in no way be accurately construed as damage - for alpine grazing, when managed effectively, does not result in cumulative damage to the ecology of the Victorian Alps. Scientific evidence frequently cited by lobby groups such as the VNPA indicates that domestic cattle have an 'impact on both the structure and composition of subalpine grassland and heathland vegetation' (Wahren et.al 1994). The cattlemen of Victoria do not deny that cattle have an impact on the alpine environment. What the cattlemen strenuously object to is the repeated interpretation of these impacts as signs of damage to the alpine environment. The Nationals, like the cattlemen, recognise that some lobby groups allow
their ideological opposition to alpine grazing to influence their interpretation
of the available data about the ecological effects of cattle in the high
country. As such, the Nationals call on the Government to exercise caution
when considering the ideologically loaded arguments of extreme environmental
lobbyists. While these lobbyists have maintained a consistent opposition
to alpine grazing for some years now, they have failed to provide any
realistic and informed alternative land management scenarios for the Victorian
Alps. This speaks volumes about the commitment of such groups to the active
and sustainable management of the Alpine National Park. 9. Conclusion The pest animal and plant problems and insufficiently managed fire risks of the Alpine National Park necessitate the immediate reappraisal of public land stewardship in the Victorian Alps. An attractive future option for park's management would consist of the development of an inclusive land management regime capable of bringing various motivated stakeholders together in cooperative efforts to actively manage the land and waterways of the Alpine National Park. The cattlemen community would be a true asset to such a regime, as their prolonged interaction with the Victorian Alps has endowed them with an intimate understanding of the alpine environment and an acute sensitivity to adverse environmental change within that environment. The Nationals recognise that the immediate renewal of alpine grazing licences will ensure that in the future, government departments and agencies will continue to be able to draw on the considerable knowledge and insight of the cattlemen community. In the absence of grazing licences, the valuable presence of cattlemen will be lost from the high country landscape for good. This would be a loss mourned by the many Victorians who value the ongoing presence of the mountain cattlemen in the Alpine National Park.
Holth, Tor., (1980) Cattlemen of the High Country Rigby Publishers Ltd, Sydney Martin, P., & Lockie, S., (1993) 'Environmental information for total catchment management: Incorporating local knowledge' in Australian Geographer 24 (1) pp 75 - 85 Russell, J., & Jambrecina., (2002) 'Wilderness and cultural landscapes: Shifting management emphasis in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area' in Australian Geographer 33 (2) pp 125-139 Wahren, C-H.A., Papst, W.A., and Williams, R.J., (1994) 'Long-term vegetation change in relation to Cattle Grazing in Subalpine Grassland and Heathland on the Bogong High Plains: An Analysis of Vegetation Records from 1945 to 1994' in The Australian Journal of Botany 42 (6) pp 607 - 639.
|