MT. ROUSE & DISTRICT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Penshurst * Historical * Tourism * Western District*
* Volcanic Trail * Victoria * Australia*
![]()
![]()
(Technical hint: 'Click on thumbnail' images to bring up full size pictures. BACK command will restore page)
|
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Aner Elizabeth Sharrock
|
i. Mount Rouse Tragedy Everyones family history contains accounts of triumph and tragedy that intermingle with the basic facts to create the fascinating story of our past. These stories are what put the "flesh on the bones" of our ancestors from times long ago, and perhaps make them seem a little more real, especially to the younger generations of today. This is the story of one of my ancestors tragedies, and given the debate that rages today on the vaccination issue, is perhaps a timely reminder of how far we have come in the past 100 years. Aner Elizabeth SHARROCK was born on the 10th of August, 1859 at "Lovely Banks", her grandfathers property on the outskirts of Penshurst. Aner was the first child born to James SHARROCK and his wife Mary (nee PORTER) who had married in November the previous year. The Sharrock family had come to Australia from Northampton, England in 1848, landing in Geelong and living for a time in the Colac area before moving to Penshurst in the early 1850s. Aners grandfather, Joseph, was involved in the first Roads Board at Penshurst and served as one of the first councillors for the local Shire. James and Mary went on to have 11 children altogether, 6 boys and 5 girls. Two of the children did not live to adulthood. James died in infancy in 1874 and Kitty (Catherine Louisa) died in 1870 aged 6 years. Aner married William WHITTLEY on the 2nd of February, 1878 in the Presbyterian Church at Penshurst. William was the son of James WHITTLEY and Bridget (nee LARKINS) and was born on 10th of July, 1852 at Belfast (later Port Fairy). William and Aner had four children together all born at Penshurst. Rachel was born in 1878, William Thomas on the 6th July 1880, Harriet in 1882 and James on the 1st of October, 1884. In December 1884, diptheria struck the young Whittley family in Mount Rouse. William Thomas was the first to perish on the 12th December, aged 4 years old. He was buried at the Boram Boram Cemetery the following day. On the 13th December, the day William Thomas was buried, his sister Rachel, aged 6 years also died. Rachel was buried on the 14th December, the same day that 2-year-old Harriet succumbed to the disease. The Whittley family had been severely decimated by the disease but it had not yet finished with them. Aner followed her children to their graves a week later, dying on the 21st December 1884. She was buried at Boram Boram Cemetery the following day. She was just 25 years old. There was also another victim of the diphtheria in the Sharrock family. Aners maternal aunt, Elizabeth SHARROCK (nee PORTER) died in Hamilton Hospital on the 28th of December of the disease. Elizabeth had helped nurse her niece and the children through the course of the disease. Family legend states that she was responsible for saving the infant James from becoming sick by passing him out the window. I assume to another family member who cared for him. It is also believed that Elizabeth contracted diptheria by placing the nappy pins in her mouth whilst changing nappies. Elizabeth was also laid to rest in the Boram Boram Cemetery. Aners husband, William remarried on the 3rd of August, 1889 in North Fitzroy to Amy Hooper and went on to have 2 more children. William died on the 21st of December 1929 and was buried in the Fawkner Cemetery. The baby James, who was only a couple of months old when the tragedy struck, grew up and married Elsie Florence Maud MEREDITH in Coburg on the 24th August, 1918 and the couple had four children of their own. James died on the 2nd of July 1935 and is also buried in the Fawkner Cemetery. James was a great painter and made his living by painting teacups and plates with bush scenes and garden scenes. He apparently travelled to America to study while he was still young. His best painting is said to be entitled "Queen Esther", which is believed to be in possession of one of his sons. His other apparent claim to fame was the painting of a war scene on one of the walls of Dame Nellie Melbas house. The photograph of Aner that accompanies this article was painted by James, as is evident by his signature on the bottom of the portrait. And so ends the story of my Great Great Aunt, Aner Elizabeth WHITTLEY (nee SHARROCK) and her family. I often wonder how sad that Christmas was for them with so many members of the family dead so close to Christmas Day. In a way I suppose it was a blessing that baby James was only a couple of months old and couldnt understand the trauma that was affecting his family. The grief that William must have suffered during this time, I cant even begin to hope to understand. I imagine that the grief was so great that he moved to Melbourne not long after burying his family. But this is yet to be proved and maybe just the fanciful dreams of a young romantic!! Debbie Down, 12/10/99 |
|
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
|
ii.
"Threshold" Life in the 1500's by Ruth Pihl A personal view of the history and development of Penshurst and its environment. Notes from an address given to the Port Fairy Historical Society (Pioneers Dinner) 28th April, 2007. **** When we were kids history sat alongside arithmetic as a series of dull undisputed facts, lots of dates and tiresome monologues of journeys across the Blue Mountains. There was little or nothing controversial, questionable or worthy of debate. In this light I believed .... Australia was colonized by the British who dumped a lot of convicts here to get rid of excess bread thieves and other criminals. Aborigines were primitive and given to spearing people when angry. Squatters were rich people who owned sheep and took a dim view of "swaggies" in billabongs stealing them in hard times. Settlers like Dad and Dave selected land and built rudely furnished log huts in which to raise their families. Cities grew around good ports where ships could drop off people and take back things of value. Gold was discovered in Ballarat and other places in Victoria. This made some people very rich but caused a labor shortage and the call for more convicts to work the squatters' land. There was a rebellion when taxes became too high. Governments were made up of lesser English nobility, bureaucrats, military personnel and rich squatters and their mates. Punishment was harsh for people who didn't fall into any of the above categories. Ned Kelly and his mates took to bushranging because they were Irish and good with horses. Growing older I discovered that the people who write history books for grown-ups had individual views of Australia and their books reflected such views. History can't be "value free". There's too much blood and guts in it. 'Facts' began to crumble into opinions and cracks began to arise in theories once firmly held. People much older and wiser than me were beginning to question the basis on which much of our history was written. It seems that what you saw depended on where you sat. The view from the homestead dining-room isn't the same as that from the scullery. The convict whipped for insubordination may not feel like singing "All Things Bright and Beautiful." Appointed but not elected Politicians or businessmen in city offices would have little understanding of the plight of the lonely Drover's Wife. It is clichéd to say that history belongs to the winners but this seems to be so, especially when, for so long, the losers had no voice. Until recent decades few people bothered to understand the lives of Aboriginal people or concede their right to hang onto a very different history to that of the schoolbooks we grew up with. But today its hard to maintain an unwavering faith in the traditional, though not necessarily factual, view of things. Its human nature to give credit where no credit is due because it is more comfortable than exploring any options. And if we are to look at the development of the Western District we have to look fairly at the process of settlement on the one hand, and dislodgement of native peoples on the other. Rather than just applauding "development" per se we need to explore the costs. History cannot be merely a celebration of conquest or a litany of "great men" (and few women) doing great deeds. With closer scrutiny we find people who were hard working, humanitarian, enlightened, scholarly and open minded. On the other hand there were many who were greedy, single-minded, bigoted, cruel and dishonest. Those who fit the former category include, from the Western district, Aboriginal Protector, Robinson, Assistant Sievwright, his successor Dr. Watton, Ethnologist James Dawson, his daughter Isabella and pioneer Richmond Henty among many others. Here in our little township of Penshurst 500 or so people are getting on with their lives and few, I imagine, show more than a passing interest in the town's history. I'm a newcomer, settling here in the mid l990's, and enjoy a rather late interest in this district's past. I joined the Historical Society some years ago and feel a sense of something almost mystic meeting in our dusty, unrestored, junk-laden, leaky-roofed former courthouse. Like those who have come along tonight, we are from different backgrounds and don't see everything in the same way. That's what makes it interesting. There's so much to learn from one another. Sometimes the 'truths' we hear do not stand up to closer examination and require amendment. Historians who might call themselves revisionist are not as quick to applaud unquestioningly the actions of those who 'settled the land' as earlier scribes writing history. They may choose to linger a while over the very earliest settlers of our country. We read that aboriginal people had inhabited the district for many thousands of years. Plenty of food and water meant that, far from being 'nomadic' in the wider sense they would not have moved far from tribal lands. Animal fossil, including those of the 'super' marsupials, have been found in local bogs. Such prehistoric animals were thought, by Tim Flannery, to have been finally hunted to extinction by aboriginal people thousands of years ago. A district well watered by springs, including the present "never-failing" spring, the aboriginal tribe named "Kolor" was believed to be local though, as previously stated, their nomadic habits were noted. The word 'kolor', according to James Dawson who was concerned to note and record aboriginal languages, means lava. Our volcano, Mt. Rouse, once thought to be a "young" volcano - along with Mt. Eccles to the West - is now believed to be an "ancient" volcano. Its said to have erupted some 300,000 years ago spewing lava and ash down to the coast and beyond. This is well illustrated at Tower Hill in the museum there. Mt. Rouse was first sighted, and named, by Major Mitchell (the man who had a cockatoo named after him), from the vantage point of Mt. Napier to the west, on September l836. Three years later the first settler, John Cox took up land around the mount, moving north from Port Fairy. The district was already occupied by about 33 clans of the above tribe, along with many neighbouring tribes dotted throughout the district. White settlements were Germantown (Tarrington), Dunkeld, Wickliffe, Lake Boloke, down to Salt Creek, Hexham and Caramut. The land around Mt. Rouse was said to be particularly good, or lucky according to the term Australia Felix given it by Major Mitchell. Relinquishing it was the source of a lot of bickering and discontent when Cox was sent packing after Lieutenant Governor La Trobe announced that a square, each side 10 miles, around and encompassing Penshurst, would be set aside for an Aboriginal Protectorate. From here the various versions of the story of the spearing by natives of Cox's overseer, Codd are still told and we can choose which one sounds the most credible. However Codd died (by one spear or ten) it took two years to find an aboriginal named "Roger" guilty of murder and subsequently hanged for the offense. This despite the fact that he did not fit the description of the murderer and nor was he able to speak a word of English in his defence. Historian Jan Chritchett and one-time resident of Port Fairy, tells us that : "European settlement was already well under way in late 1838. Under the dates 8 and 13 September l938 Captain Foster "Flogger" Fyans, Police Magistrate at Geelong, sent to Sydney two lists 'which together named thirty-two men who from l August to l2 September had paid five pounds each for six month licences..in the "Western situation" of the "Geelong district." In early l938, David Fisher and an exploring party travelled across the district visiting the Grampians and the Pyrenees. It was at this time they established a station at Mount Shadwell (Mortlake). One is reminded of Margaret Kiddle's statement in 'Men of Yesterday.' By the end of l938 the Western District was in tenuous occupation.' Frederick Taylor was already at Mt. Noorat in March l939, and Matthew Gibson occupied land near Mt. William during l939. By October l839 the Colac country was comparatively crowded with stations, settlement having expanded westward from the more densely settled area north and north-west of Geelong. There were already three or four runs between Lake Corangamite and the Hopkins River including those of the Manifold Brothers, of Frederick Taylor and Henry Gibb on land that was to become the township of Camperdown. By the summer of l939-40 Charles Gray was established, the Burchetts had occupied the Gums station and John Muston had taken up land on Muston's Creek." History doesn't start in the late l830's but for Europeans it may as well have done. By that time much of the land was taken up by well resourced squatters, who were troubled by a dwindling supply of convicts, natives, unreliable shepherds in the days before fences, the unpredictability of weather and, as one historian coined the phrase, the "Tyranny of Distance." In l839, Western Victorian squatter, Niel Black, gave the following advice .. "The best way (to procure a run) is to go outside and take up a new run, provided the conscience of the party is sufficiently seared to enable him without remorse to slaughter natives right and left. It is universally and distinctly understood that the chances are very small indeed of a person taking up a new run being able to maintain possession of the place and property without having recourse to such means - sometimes by wholesale." According to Ian Clark's "Scars in the Landscape" Black didn't practice what he preached and finally bought the established run, Glenormiston. Lets imagine, from here on, were going to write the screenplay for a film entitled "How the West was Won." Into this scene comes the politician, Lieutenant Governor La Trobe, the bureaucrat (and Aboriginal Protector) George Augustus Robinson and the man appointed to oversee the newly ascribed Mt. Rouse Protectorate, Assistant Protector ex-naval man Captain Charles Sievwright - the humanitarian. Later, in l842, under a year into his tenure, he would be sacked by Robinson on “moral” charges and his place taken by Dr. Watton - the doctor. Later, in this story will come ethnologist and amateur linguist James Dawson and his daughter Isabella and finally pioneer diarist Redmond Henty. Four "Fixed Stations "were to be erected throughout the State for containing/protecting/supporting/feeding aboriginal people although only the one Mt. Rouse protectorate was ever built. The instructions given to the State's four Assistant Protectors - William Thomas, James Dredge, Edward Parker and Charles Sievwright were ... "it will be your duty .. to watch over the rights and interests of the natives and to endeavour to gain their respect and confidence. You will, as far as you are able by your personal exertions and influence, protect them from any encroachments on their property and from acts of cruelty, oppression and injustice." The above statement, coming from Governor Gipps in Sydney and originating in the English Parliament, is of benevolent Christian charity in line with that supposedly bestowed on the native peoples of other parts of the colonies, such as India, China and Africa. It was strongly influenced by the successful push to abolish slavery – at least that of slaves on British soil. The staff to carry out this charter, recruited in England, no doubt set off with the best of intentions and an unswerving belief in the governing bodies of the day to provide support. They were soon to be disillusioned and their mission doomed to early failure.Back in Australia, we can picture them setting off. Wagons loaded high with household requirements, portable building materials, provisions etc. Protector Robinson had already travelled extensively in Victoria, mapping and plotting the various aboriginal tribal boundaries. By the time his Assistants were to be placed in the field, he was familiar was with most of the tribes and where their lands began and ended. Long winded and rather 'holier than thou,' he was nonetheless unwavering in his view that cruelty and/or injustice were not to be tolerated. In this regard he was outraged by the belief among squatters that sheep stealing meant a bullet. "Sheep did not equal a human life," he railed. Into the picture comes Assistant Portector Seivwright with his family and entourage. After a few abortive attempts to settle at Lake Keilambete and Lake Terang Assistant Protector, Captain Seivwright finally settled, with his wife and seven children and a few staff at Mt. Rouse, where the Protectorate was established against strong opposition from local squatters. It is thought to have been located somewhere near the Penshurst spring (perhaps where the Police Station is today) though no trace of it remains. He took his work seriously and struggled hard to adhere to the charter of duty above. He was quickly frustrated by the lack of promised food and provisions, building materials, support and, in fact, anything at all that might assist in making the Protectorate work. Considerable correspondence went back and forth to his superior, Governor Gipps in Sydney, most of it falling upon very deaf ears. Despite the noted delineation of tribal boundaries, aboriginal people were 'herded up' from different and sometimes warring tribes and taken to Mt. Rouse, where they were to receive shelter and food rations in return for work, a settled secure life and where their children would be educated and brought up as Christians. Nothing like this happened. Of the several hundred odd aboriginal men, women and children 'gathered' into Mt. Rouse, most came and went seeking food elsewhere. Rations were scant and often non existent. Few were able or willing to 'work' digging crops and when they were rewarded for doing so shared out among the underserving as well as the deserving as there was little enough to fend off starvation. Aboriginal Protector Robinson had little of practical benefit to offer and the two men fell permanently out of favour with one another. Meanwhile, the Mt. Rouse establishment, encompassing around 10 square miles around the area that later became Penshurst, flounders and its aboriginal population drift in and out, often hunting and returning (when threatened by squatters) to the Protectorate. The Portland “Mercury” of August l842 reported on the Mount Rouse settlement: "At the central aboriginal station and homestead of this district near Mt. Rouse the passing traveller is greeted by the appearance of a neat collection of huts in number about sixty, and having the appearance of a regular village. Streets have been laid out and trees and all other obstructions removed solely by the labour of the natives. The discipline of the community is extremely regular; exactly at the hour of six o'clock a bell is rung at the quarters of the Assistant Protector (at this stage, Dr. Watton) There is also a routine which included daily prayers, as one aspect of the Protectorate was to bring Christianity to the aboriginal people." What are we to believe? No doubt the representatives of the Crown, Gibbs and LaTrobe, were able to assure gentlefolk in England that the natives were safe and being well cared for, the bureaucrat reinforces this view, accentuating the positive and overlooking the negative and the folks on the ground are going mad with overwork, stress, hardship and lack of even the most rudimentary support from those above. Sievwright, who was loathed by Robinson, was sacked for immorality in the form of alleged incest with his l6 year old daughter, and spent the rest of his life, or so we are told, back in England fighting in vain to clear his name. His place was taken by Dr. Watton, a kindly man from all accounts, who maintains the Protectorate for another 8 or so years until the last aboriginal to be contained therein, collects up his or her frugal belongings and takes to the bush. Dr. Watton is quick to remind his superiors that he is, in fact, undertaking two jobs – that of medical practitioner and Assistant Protector. His salary, he complains, is not as high as that of his predecessor and nor does he hold the title “Assistant Protector.” Despite this, Dr. Watton's medical ministrations outlast the Protectorate and his reputation remains positive. On the other hand, this gentle caring doctor who has treated much of the medical needs of those in his charge, (largely venereal and respiratory diseases), has not learned a single word of their language or languages and is no longer a believer in benevolent Christianity. In frustration perhaps he suggests a tougher line be taken with aborigines. In an enquiry into the conditions of the Port Phillip Aborigines in l845, Watton stated: “Their wandering habits, their natural indolence, their thievish propensities, their innate pugnacious disposition, being in my opinion only to be kept in check by force, I fear that nothing short of a system of absolute coercion can effect any change worthy of the name of civilization.” In l848 La Trobe agrees and recommended that coersion would replace co-operation, the young and old be seperated, that all be put to work on reserves where they would be forbidden to leave. The gloves were really off and the aboriginal people, subject to so much suffering and loss would be finally a defeated race entirely subject to the laws and custody of the white man.According to Robert Hughes in his book "The Fatal Shore” (pp. 272-273) ....The fate of the Australian blacks was intimately connected to the System. A frontier society based on slave labor, run by the threat of extreme violence and laced with rigid social divisions was not likely to treat the Aborigines compassionately or even fairly. Nor did it. There was a great gap between policy and practice. The Royal instructions to every governor of Australia, from Arthur Phillip in l988 to Thomas Brisbane in l822, always repeated the same themes. The aborigines must not be molested. Anyone who "wantonly" killed them (and he and others state that over 20,000 of them had been murdered) or gave them "any unnecessary interruption in the exercise of their several occupations, must be punished. The aim in racial relations was "amity and kindness." The idea of converting them to Christianity would not be embodied in official policy until Brisbane's successor as governor, Ralph Darling came in 1825. Yet, even though white settlement began with no policy of racist persecutions, the coming of the whites was an unmitigated disaster for everyone with a black skin." Documentation of the sites of aboriginal slaughter in the South West of Victoria, clustered far more densely than anywhere else in the State, clearly show the worst years for this type of violence to be the years l836-l842.Back in l877, one district voice stood out. James Dawson, who considered himself an ethnologist (and linguist) rather than an anthropologist, expressed deep concern for the direction of aboriginal policy in the colonies. With the skilled assistance of his daughter Isabella, he provided a scholarly understanding of aboriginal language and culture. He believed that their customs were right and natural for them and decried the tendency to burden them with prayers and christian observances far more onerous and time consuming than that for whites. Outraged at the thoughtless burial of one of the aboriginal chiefs in a bog outside the cemetery at Camperdown, Dawson raised funds to provide a respectful burial and erect a monument to him and to aboriginal people. This monument still stands in the Camperdown cemetery. In the l981 Journal of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies (Facsimile Edition), we hear Dawson's views ...
|
|
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
Site contents: 7. Explore Historical Penshurst 10. Feature Articles (this page)
|
Ed.: We are leaving the pictures below, since they are most relevant to the above topic, i.e. without Mt Rouse, no Penshurst.
![]() ![]() A "belt" of wattle trees could until recently be seen below the pines.
8/8/02: The walking track (above right) is well underway.
iv. "FRIGHTFUL RAILWAY ACCIDENT"* The headline above appeared in The Western Agriculturist on March 8, 1890. A tombstone at Boram Boram cemetery a few kilometres outside Penshurst, is the only visible reminder of the accident, 109 years later. The news paper article lists the seven names John Dillon 24yrs, James O'Brien, 28yrs, John O'Donnell, 28yrs, John Dumphey, 25yrs, Patrick M' Gee, 33yrs, William Walters, 25yrs, James Stanley, alias Donelly, alias O'Callaghan, 23yrs. As can be seen from the tombstone, James O'Brien's name is not listed, and several of the names are spelt differently. We do not know why one of them was buried separately, but it is noted that James O'Brien.."supposed to have relatives in Melbourne and said to have been an ex-constable". All were Irish, and all were unmarried. Nine others were injured in the accident: "A terrible catastrophe occurred on Saturday evening within about two miles of Penshurst. About 25 of the men employed by Messrs. N. McNeil and Co. in the construction of the railway from Penshurst to Koroit left the former township about a quarter past seven o'clock ...The truck in which the men travelled was pushed before the engine, the latter being in charge of Driver Simpson. THE ENGINE DRIVER'S STATEMENT James Edward Simpson said: ..Nearing the scene of the accident we were going about 20 miles an hour or so...The guard of the train was on front of the engine. He gave a signal "Steady" with his hand. I reversed the engine about 20 yards before the truck struck the bullock. It might have been more than 20 yards. I did not see the bullock on the line, and it was impossible for me in my position to to see it at all, as it was in the cutting on the left hand side. ...When I reversed I called to the fireman to put the brake on and he did so...If I had seen the bullock in the cutting I would have stopped as soon as possible...I did not hear anybody on the truck to sing out about the cow...The engine was going about 15 miles an hour....The whistle was blown. STATEMENTS BY MEN WHO WERE IN THE TRUCK ...I heard the chaps singing out that there was was something in front, I gave a look, saw the bullock and in a second the truck upset to the right side... SEVEN MEN KILLED - NINE OTHERS INJURED ...The truck left the rails and capsized to the right side. The engine rushed on top of the truck and the carnage was fearful. About ten of the men were fortunately thrown clear of both truck and engine and escaped with a few scratches.. Two of the unfortunate travellers, however, fell directly under the wheels of the engine, one of them being decapitated and the other cut in two, the wheels passing over his stomach...James Stanley....was caught under the truck, had his skull fractured, ribs and shoulders broken, and right arm severed from the body."... DR. FRANK A. SWEETNAM"My name is FRANK A. SWEETNAM and I declare under oath that I am a duly qualified Medical Practitioner residing at Penshurst. I attended at the scene of the accident to the contractors train from Penshurst at about 8 p.m. or a little before that hour on Saturday night, and found life then extinct in the bodies of seven men. On the Sunday morning, after I made a close examination of the bodies of the seven following men, I found the wounds on each as follows.. 1. JOHN DUNPHY had a flesh wound on the right leg, contusions over the whole body, blood pouring from left ear, and a fracture on base of skull, which was the immediate cause of death. 2. JAMES OBRIEN contused wounds on both legs, face livid, marked ecchymoses over body, chaff in mouth. No apparent wound sufficient to cause death, which, to the best of my belief was due to suffocation. 3. WILLIAM WALTERS had a contusion on chest, lacerations of upper lips, face livid, superficial wound on right hip, bloody froth issuing from mouth. None of his external wounds were sufficient to cause death, which, in my opinion, was due to suffocation. 4. PATRICK McGEE, I found had his left arm fractured in two places, his skull fractured, neck fractured, the skull being almost severed from the body. 5. JOHN DILLON had slight abrasions on both legs, contusions on right arm, and also on back of right shoulders, froth and chaff in mouth, face livid. None of his wounds were sufficient to cause death which, from the signs and general appearance of body was, to the best of my belief, due to suffocation. 6. JOHN ODONNELL had slight wounds on both legs, severe scalp wounds, fractures of left arm, badly cut, almost in two through abdomen, fracture of spine through lumbar vertebrae. 7. JAMES CALLANAN had a fracture of left forearm, compound fracture of right shoulder, lacerated wound of axilla cutting through large vessels, fractures of skull and right ear torn off." (SIGNED) F.A. SWEETNAM Surgeon and Physician March 4th. TAKEN AND SWORN at Penshurst the 20th day of March l890 before me (Coroner; indecipherable name) The above statement read by Eric Pihl at the Commemoration ceremony On the 26th March, 2000 HOW THE ACCIDENT OCCURRED It is quite clear that the primary cause of the accident is to be found in the circumstance that the truck in which the unfortunate men were being conveyed was pushed before the engine instead of being drawn after it. Such a proceeding would not be permitted on a line working under the regulation of the Victorian Railways, but on a line in course of construction - still under the management of the contractors - it may, it appears, be done without transgressing any known rule. AT THE PENSHURST HOTEL ...Dr. Sweetnam did all that medical skill could do to alleviate pain, and he was soon joined in his ministrations by Dr. Woodforde, of Penshurst, and Drs. Bennett and Robinson of Hamilton, who speedily responded to a telegraphic summons. It was found that three of the men were so badly hurt that skilled nursing was required for them, and they were removed to the Hamilton Hospital by special train on Sunday. THE FEELING IN PENSHURST ..."Such an inhuman butchery is a disgrace to civilization, and if we may only have railways at such acost we would a thousand times prefer to be without them"...Had the engine gone before it the locomotive would possibly have had little difficulty in dealing with a stray animal. THE UNFENCED LINE The line is fenced nearly all the way to Hawkesdale, but there are still gaps here and there through which cattle may come without let or hindrance..." The following song has been submitted by our correspondent: Words On a Stone Down where the grass covers words on a stone, and old plastic flowers are withered and blown. If you look very close, you will see without fail, that here lie the men who died out on the rail. ** "There's cattle a-straying" James O'Callahan said "They're out on the line", so he said. The rest of the story in history is read how by evening the seven lay battered and dead. ** Some miles out of Penshurst, out there in the stones young bodies were scattered and torn and the People of Penshurst all wept when they saw the brave Irish lads who would travel no more. ** Now more than a hundred long years have flown. The railway is closed and the sleepers have gone, but for sleepers whose spirits stayed there with the train we'll sing them to rest back in Ireland again. *** By Ruth Pihl, 28/4/1999. *We thank Joe Ewing for providing the original newspaper article. |