|
REFERENDUM OR PUBLIC MEETING
Bill Brown requested a council referendum either at the November 2005 election (saving money) or held separately using money held in reserve from the Village - $93,000.
Another matter which may have involved insurance was the burning down of the international doll display house in August 2004. Small cost when such a significant loss of public parkland is at issue. This was discussed at the November Council meeting request denied.
Once again the option of council calling a public meeting was refused fourth time now!
Council does not inform the public of the costs to fight this community with barristers representing it at both Planning & Heritage Hearings!
The committee will continue to fight on with objections to flawed Council social, environmental and flood planning, heritage and 2030 issues as the focus for lobbying state Ministers, and VicUrban, hoping that someone will stand up for the rights of those affected by Council decisions made in cabinet.
THIS COMMUNITY HAS NO VOICE IN COUNCIL
With the exception of community minded Cr Bruce Wilson, who consistently states his objections, Council continues to tell government Ministers, their Departmental officers, and the media that it has consulted widely on this significant issue.
Does anyone remember being asked if he/she would agree to a housing estate on our public parklands before City Council agreed to give the site to VicUrban to develop entering into a Deed of Agreement September 2002?
Our Committee has written twice to request that question time be an option at Council meetings, including a submission following a review of Council Meeting processes in 2004. Nothing was resolved.
A request to have talkback on COGS on AIR met with little or no response in 2003!
Question time is allowed for at meetings in many other municipalities, why not ours?
Council then expresses concern with the actions of frustrated communities conducting rallies, and writing letters to newspapers, speaking on radio and TV WHAT OTHER OPTION DOES THIS COMMUNITY HAVE TO CHALLENGE COUNCIL DECISIONS WHICH AFFECT THEM SOCIALLY AND ENVIRONMENTALLY?
Costly legal challenges such as Panel Hearings and VCAT end up costing this community twice over. When Council fights community on social planning issues such as we have had in the past two years costs must be borne through rates.
|