![]() |
|
|
|
1. A very serious adult maths mistake - to think that because population growth rates are slowing down, then population increases will get smaller - Hurray? No.
|
Always ask 'How many?' 'When?' 'Why?
|
The media publish many letters of shock at the violence in peace protests and the like. These letters are written by people who see the shots on TV of about twenty people in clashes with the police, in a demonstration with from five thousand to 150,000 other protesters who are all peaceful. These twenty aggressors are of three types - provocateurs, yobboes out for a stoush, and a few who believe that unless they are violent the media will pay no attention to their protest. The media then justify their belief by concentrating on the violence and overlooking or minimising the peace-makers.
The media publish the violence in part because they think that viewers like to see violence, and in part to discredit the other thousands of marchers.Everyone should know about 'Social Arithmetic'. Always ask 'how many?' 'When?' and 'Why?' before making generalisations about the majority from knowledge - or glimpses - of a few.
Most men are NOT rapists, most families are NOT unhappy, and most peace-marchers are NOT the exhibitionists or rowdies who monopolise the media attention.
'War is inevitable because humans
are innately violent' Women are liable to be silly, and
many men are liable to be stupid' Social arithmetic is a way of checking generalisations
about nations, genders, social classes, age-groups etc. It
does this by estimating the number or proportion of people
they apply to. e.g. applied to the cliché that
'War is inevitable because humans are
innately violent' cuts the generalisation in half by
excluding women, and then cuts it further by considering how
many men in a sample of 100 are actually the warmakers, in
different cultures and at different periods of history. 'Men are all rapists' is
tested by how many men in a sample of 100 would ever be
violent sexually, and of those who are, how often and under
what circumstances, in different times and places of
history. Similarly with the generalisation, that
'women are liable to be silly, and
men are liable to be stupid'. The practice of arguing with 'social arithmetic' is a democratic argument -
because it says that what individuals do does matter. They
are not helpless. When anyone deliberately collects biros, or regards the
firm's property as perks, or enjoys evading tax, or hits
their girlfriends, they are helping to push 'average
behaviour' into a criminal mode, which fosters increased
numbers of deliberately antisocial individuals at the lower
extreme, and makes it harder for others to be honest. Road
speeds are a clear example of how this can happen. When
enough drivers are doing 80 on a suburban road marked at 60,
then the irresponsible drivers will go at 100 kph, and the
more law-abiding drivers feel forced to go at 80 kph too,
regardless of personal wishes or feeling that they are not
very safe drivers at that speed.
'Men are all rapists'