Young People and the Arts

The Youth Panel of the Australia Council, the Commonwealth Government's principle arts funding and advisory body, was formed in late 1999­an outcome of 'Youth and the Arts' being one of the priorities of Council's Strategic Plan for 1999­2001. Composed of thirteen artists and youth arts workers from around Australia from diverse artistic and cultural backgrounds, the ambitious purpose of the Panel is to address the involvement of youth (under 27 years) in the arts in varying capacities­as artists, participants, and audiences. Meeting several times per year and between times by email, the Panel essentially acts as an advisory group to the Australia Council, and at times, a mediating group between the 'youth' arts field and the Council.

During 2000, the year I was involved, the Panel connected to the Council at various levels. We assessed the funding process-at the majority of Board meetings a Youth Panel member would attend as an observer. We held public sessions after our meetings, and initiated a media strategy (including the production of an Avant Card) in the hope of getting more young people aware of and involved in the Council. We also initiated the strategies that the current members are finalising before the Panel disbands at the end of the year. These include the appointment of younger peers on the funding boards, the formation of a Youth Arts Group made up of staff members of the Council, a push for microgrants, the initiation of youth and the arts public forums, and the identification of new technologies and education as key areas to pursue, the publication of a 'How To Where To Guide' for young and emerging artists to get their projects up, a research study on mentorships, and the possibility of a Youth Policy within the Council.

Like all institutions, the Australia Council is a complex, multi­layered product of history-parts of which are more 'youth­friendly' than others. Clearly it will take more than a panel to effect the kind of changes that some people would like to see. Nevertheless, in my view, the Panel represents a positive step in a continual process of updating the Council's attitudes towards young people's involvement with the arts today, and a moment of openness in trying to get the more or less nineteenth century breakdown of artform funds to speak to one another. When the Youth Panel comes to the end of its tenure, my hope is that the Australia Council will be a less forbidding organisation for young artists to apply to or get information from.

I have also been invited here to say a few words about how the Museum and Gallery world might involve young people more pro­actively. I will offer a few thoughts, but I do this somewhat uncomfortably, as Youth Panel discussion rarely focused on the specifics of institutions, and I am no expert on cultural policy. Firstly, it pays to remember that there is no such thing as 'youth'. Youth is a demographic category whose constituents are an agglomeration of young people of widely differing classes, genders, sexualities, ethnicities and so on. If we are to speak about audiences, as it is assumed we are, the young visitor might be conceived less in terms of requiring enlightenment than on more uncertain grounds. We have to accept that young people's singular experiences are as valid as adults are. Moreover, contrary to conventional wisdom, an audience does not preexist an event. Recognising that the event makes the audience happen will allow the exploration of differences in ways that are liberating to the extent that they assume nothing in advance.

Secondly, more than just seeing young people as an audience to be captured, institutions need to affirm the concept of wider, distributed empowerment of young people in regard to cultural life: not to dumb down content for young people, but to trust in the possibility of letting young people themselves create their own projects, networks and institutions. Institutions may need to open themselves up to 'parasite' projects. Given that cultural institutions are by their very nature conservative, an institutional pragmatism is required. To the best of their abilities, institutions need to invite young people on their boards, employ young people, embrace opportunities for young people to work with more experienced people and offer training in the practicalities of professional practice, support volunteer programs, keep admission prices as low as possible, use new technologies and take risks. And it goes without saying that some institutions are already doing this very well.

- Daniel Palmer is a writer, teacher and Informations Coordinator at the Centre for Contemporary Photography and is completing a PhD at Melbourne University on New Media. During 2000, he was the Victorian member of the Australia Council's Youth Panel. For more information on the Youth Panel and other initiatives such as the Youth and the Arts Framework, call Terese Casu at the Australia Council on (02) 9215 9191 or by email at t.casu@ozco.gov.au

 

Back to Index of Articles