Learning For Volunteering

Sonnie Hopkins believes that it is time for volunteering to be recognised as skilled work, alongside paid work.

High level skills are important to paid work and Australia's future economic well being. This is something we hear almost daily. But seldom do government ministers or the press talk of the place of skills in the work of volunteers! Yet volunteers create wealth that benefits many people. Estimates for Australia put the value of volunteer output as equivalent to that of a major industry sector. Volunteers also create other forms of value. One is the sense of self-worth that volunteering engenders-a benefit that flows on to others in many ways. Another is the contribution to social cohesion that derives from the voluntary nature of the work.

It seems too, that the work of volunteers is of growing importance. For instance, an aging community means expanding demand for many of the services that volunteers provide. Not only will there be more call on support for the elderly; more 'third agers' will mean greater time for leisure and personal development pursuits, amongst them exploration of their natural and cultural heritage.

Enterprises in the market economy are increasingly reliant for their survival on highly capable and committed employees. The same can be said of organisations that employ volunteers. Recipients expect 'first rate' service regardless of whether those with whom they deal are paid or unpaid. And they are likely to demand an even higher level of capability than hitherto. To illustrate: museums must service an increasingly educated community seeking answers to more complex questions and guidance in the use of more powerful, and skill-demanding, search and retrieval technologies. Also, volunteering can involve duty of care-for museum personnel in the security of artefacts, and seeing to it that a safe environment is maintained.

The training of paid workers presents many challenges to enterprises in the market economy. But challenges can be even greater for organisations looking to train their voluntary workers. Volunteers are typically busy people with many commitments; they often have difficulty in finding time to attend training outside rostered hours. Rosters typically have volunteers thinly spread over lengthy cycles, making cost efficient training provision problematic. Moreover, the very tight financial conditions that most organisations operate under, makes efficiency in training very important. In addition, there may be a lack of people who are skilled in training delivery, especially where an organisation is establishing a new service or expanding to a distant location.

It is not surprising then, that research has shown that the training of volunteers is a major concern to the organisations that employ them. Nor is it surprising that the more highly educated are disproportionately represented amongst Australia's volunteer population. This partly reflects cultural tradition. But it probably also stems from the tendency for the more educated to feel they require little training, since they are confident that they bring to their volunteering considerable knowledge and skill, including well developed learning ability. Notwithstanding, training is vital to all volunteer performance, whether as on-the-job induction or more formally delivered. One of the things that educationists have come to appreciate over recent years is the contextual nature of knowledge in action-which is what skilled work is. We are all 'ducks out of water' when we take on a new job! Nonetheless, it is not in the interest of organisations employing volunteers to have some sections of the community less inclined to work in this way-recruiting suitable numbers of volunteers is a common problem. Nor is the present situation consistent with a society that is egalitarian. Might every-day acknowledgment, by governments and the press, of the worth that volunteers create-not just at the Olympics-encourage more people to offer their services? And would reference to the diversity of skills required for different forms of volunteer work, as for different forms of paid work, encourage people from all sorts of backgrounds to see that they have something to offer? Furthermore, might the status of volunteer work be enhanced?

It is my belief that government recognition should extend to national vocational education and training policy explicitly placing voluntary work alongside paid work. This would not imply government commitment to across-the-board funding for training of volunteers, though it could mean better access to funds. It would also provide all organisations employing volunteers with a say in the forms and content of vocational education and training nationally. In addition, it could include a framework for volunteers who wish it, to have their learning recognised, so that it carries due weight with employers in the market economy-something that happens too rarely at present. However, it is stressed that the volunteer must be free to choose whether he or she wants formal recognition of learning; the alternative puts at risk many of the attractive features of volunteering.

Australia, like governments in many other developed countries, is promoting learning as being a lifelong endeavour for active and fulfilling participation in work and the community generally. Surely this means all work, paid, voluntary and home duties!

Sonnie Hopkins recently retired from the position of Research Fellow with the University of Melbourne. An exploratory project on volunteer training formed part of her research undertaken in association with the Monash-ACER Centre for the Economics of Education and Training (CEET). See www.education.monash.edu.au/centres/CEET. CEET can be contacted on 03 9905 9157.

 

Back to Index of Articles