BKK Post / 12 June 1998 POWER PURCHASE DEAL Govt urged not to sign pact with Laos Opponents cite drop in domestic demand Fourteen environment groups yesterday called on the government to forego signing of an agreement to purchase electricity generated by the planned Nam Theun Two dam in Laos. In a letter addressed to the prime minister and related officials, the groups claimed that the signing of the power purchase agreement was not justifiable considering existing economic conditions and falling power demand within the country as well as the project's negative social and environmental impact. The move came as the Laotian government recently requested the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand to discuss the agreement to buy 600 megawatts from its mega-hydro electric project. Egat earlier signed a memorandum of understanding to purchase 3,000 MW from Laos by 2006. It has already signed a power purchase agreement for electricity from four other dams. The non-governmental organisations argued that Egat has been forced by the economic crisis to revise downward its 15-year estimates of internal power demand. The demand will decrease by 11 percent from 21,432 MW to 19,049 MW in 2001 and from 41,638 MW to 37,047 MW in 2011. If the purchase from Nam Theun Two goes ahead, it would result in excessive reserves which would become a burden on Egat and eventually that burden would fall on Thai consumers. The groups said the expected lower demand increase can be met by several power generation sources already contained in Egat's development plan. These include the independent power producers and small power producers, the new Ratchaburi power plant, and China's Jin Hong dam. The groups also pointed out that the estimated price that Egat would have to pay the Laotian government for power from Nam Theun Two would be much higher than what it would be for other projects. With the year 2004 as the base, the estimated price for Nam Theun Two electricity is US$0.57 per kilowatt/hour. This is compared to the price previously quoted for power generated from the Houay Ho dam project in Laos at $0.466 per kilowatt/hour, a difference of one cent which is considered to be very high. Moreover, Laos has indicated that it will request an increase in prices quoted in all previous agreements. The groups concluded that the Nam Theun Two project was a highly risky venture - not only for Egat which would be the sole customer - but for Laos as well. In five years since the project was proposed, the estimated investment cost has nearly doubled from $800 million to $1.5 billion and its expected return has dropped 85 per cent from $250 million to $38 million. "Under the circumstances, the signing of a contract with long-term commitment should be avoided, especially with high-risk projects," the groups' statement said. Egat had earlier informed Laos of its intention not to sign the purchase deal because of delays and uncertainties in the project. In February last year, the Egat governor announced that Nam Theun Two would not be included in its plan to purchase electricity from Laos. The groups also oppose the pending signing of the agreement on social and environmental grounds. They said construction of Nam Theun Two, when completed, would block the Nam Theun River, creating a reservoir over 450 square kilometres of forest which has been declared the largest biodiversity-conservation area in Laos. Several wildlife species, some of them endemic and newly discovered, would be threatened. These include Saola, a type of forest deer and newly discovered species of carp. In addition, 28 ethnic tribes called Lao Theung living there will be vulnerable to devastating changes brought about by modern development because their way of life and culture are too fragile to adapt to changes. The action has been called for by leading environmental NGOs such as the Alternative Power for the Future, Wildlife Fund Thailand, the Foundation for Ecological Recovery, Thai Volunteer Service and the NGOs Coordinating Committee.