This paper is due to be published in Journal of Perinatology, MSS number 98124.

Authors

Koh THHG, Senior Specialist (Corresponding author)
Department of Neonatology, Kirwan Hospital for Women
Thuringowa, QLD 4817 Australia
KohT@health.qld.gov.au

Harrison H, Parent of premature baby, Author of The Premature Baby Book
1144 Sterling Avenue
Berkeley CA94708, USA

Professor Colin Morley
NICU Royal Women's Hospital
132 Grattan Street
Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia


Outcome by Gestational Age Table for parents of extremely premature infants

Informing parents who have (or are about to have) extremely premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can be challenging. There were two cases of parents who claimed that antenatally they did not receive enough information from neonatologists in spite of best efforts by the doctors.

Parents are often in a state of shock and may have problems remembering and understanding information given by doctors. Indeed we have in an earlier study found that some parents claimed that they have never been spoken to by neonatologists when the conversation actually did happen and was recorded on audio cassette tapes.

Most parents in NICU are keen to know as much as possible about their baby's condition, treatment and likely outcome. Parents of babies in NICU have written cogently about the need for family centred neonatal care which recognises the parents and family as the constant in a child's life. Family centred neonatal care also empowers parents with support, respect and encouragement thus enhancing their strength and competence. Indeed, our community is becoming better informed about health. There is a ground swell of support and government backing exists for the campaign being waged by consumer lobbies and patient organisations for better health information and for greater involvement in decision making.

Patients want honest, unbiased, up to date information about their illness, its likely outcome and the risks and benefits of different interventions. Indeed 60% of malpractice suits are the result of a breakdown in communication between doctor and patient.

To promote family centred care in NICU, it is essential that we give parents the opportunity to be aware of the likely problems that their baby may face. In clinical practice a major problem for parents is not being supplied with consistent and realistic information and advice by obstetricians, midwives and neonatologists.

There are other reasons for poor understanding by parents: poor communication techniques and lack of time in consultations, contradictory messages from different members of the team, poor health of the parents, parent denial, inexperience in terminology, unwillingness to ask questions because of the perception they are using up precious time of the doctors and the lack of opportunity to review the information given.

We can promote effective communication by ensuring that whatever was said was available for parents to look at again. We have previously proposed a simplified table on the likely outcome of extremely premature babies. It is our belief that after the conversation with the neonatologist the parents should, if they so wish, be given the likely outcome of babies at different gestations.

We now have constructed a second Outcome by Gestational Age Table based on information obtained from babies less than 29 weeks gestation born in 1996 in 50 NICUs (2025 babies of the 1996 cohort, Medical Data System in North America). This table contains information on the survival rate and short term complications and treatments of the most recent cohort of extremely preterm babies. The easy-to-understand table provides in a simple format the likely nature of the complications occurring at different gestation of extreme prematurity.


It is suggested that the parents are informed and given a copy of the following points concerning the use of the Outcome by Gestational Age Table:

We suggest that other hospitals with big NICUs might create such a table from their own recent data and the database that is most applicable to their population. The individual NICU data could be incorporated into our table so that parents can compare with a larger cohort of babies. We appreciate that each parent has unique individual preferences. Some may want every bit of information about their situation, others may not. For some parents their own previous life experiences might have more bearing on decision making than numbers that we supply them with whether by way of booklets, tables, videos or websites.

Neonatologists should initially counsel parents regarding likely outcome and then ask for their consent to be provided with such a table. The neonatologist should document the date, time and duration of the conversation, the names of the parents and the people present during the conversation and the key points shared with the parents. A copy of the completed form with the table is then given to the team member in charge of the parent / baby for insertion into the patient's file. The table may thus promote consistency in the information given to parents by different members of the perinatal team. It is also important to evaluate the use of such a table by documenting the views of parents and health care professionals of such an aid and undertaking to improve the Table.



Acknowledgment:
We thank Medical Data Systems for their kind permission to quote data from the 1996 cohort. THHGK was supported by the Private Practice Trust Fund, The Canberra Hospital. This paper was presented at the 2nd Annual Perinatal Society of Australia & New Zealand Congress (Australia), April 1998.

References:

. Kmietowicz Z. Baby not put on ventilator. BMJ 1996;313:963.
. Koh THHG. Audiotaping of parents-neonatologist conversations in NICUs. Int J Clin Pract 1998;52(1):27-29.
. Harrison H. The principles of family-centered neonatal care. Pediatr 1993;92:643-650.
. Richards T. Partnership with patients. BMJ 1998, 316:85.
. Stratmoen J. Poor communication a risk. Australian Doctor. 3/2/1995.
. Ley P, Spelman MS. Communicating with the patient. London, Staples Press 1967:9-77.
. Koh THHG. Simplified way of counselling parents about outcome of extremely premature babies. Lancet 1996; 348:963.
. National NeoKnowledge Network. Medical Data Systems Oct. 1997.



Outcome by Gestational Age Table


Name of parent / baby:_________________ Hospital:_____________________
Seen by Dr__________________on ___/___/___




GESTATION IN WEEKS

Estimates for survivors:

23

24

25-26

27-28


total number of babies admitted to NICU in 1996

(% of babies who survive )


209


(18)


291


(52)


455


(81)


761


(91)
% of survivors with breathing problems needing assisted ventilation

100

98

98

90%

Average no. of days fully ventilated


59


40


30


15
% of survivors needing extra oxygen for > 1 month.

100

100

80

47
Average no. of days in hospital before going home/baby: MDS data only
130
97
91
69

significant abnormal brain scans %


23


20


19


10
Jaundice needing phototherapy %

100

73

85

83
Heart condition (PDA) needing treatment %

31.6

52

53

36


Comments:

Outcome of the baby depends on many factors not all of which are obvious and include infection, maternal and fetal health.

The estimates in the table are based on babies who survived to be admitted to the NICU: thus the survival for all babies born are lower because some babies cannot be resuscitated at birth.

A reasonable easy to remember guide is that the survival rate is about 40% for all 24 weeks gestation babies born, 50% for all 25 weeks gestation babies, 60% for 26 weeks babies, 70% for 27 weeks and 80% for 28 weeks.

As the baby's situation changes there will be continuing honest communication between the parents and the doctors / nurses / other team members.

Parents should be encouraged to feel comfortable to contact their neonatologists for further discussions.

All efforts will be made to ensure that the baby is kept comfortable whilst receiving intensive care.

Every baby is an individual and the parents need to realise that their baby may be different from the average. The table is to share with parents risk factors that need to be understood within the unique context of the child and family.

Babies born at 25 weeks and less are at high risk of death, a long tortuous journey and disability. There are, however, some babies born at 24 and 25 weeks who seem to be developing normally.

For the individual baby, the prognosis can change with time. Firstly they have to survive being born and resuscitated, then the first few hours. If they survive the first three days without major problems then their outcome is much better.

There are situations where withdrawal of life support may be appropriate and humane. The views and wishes of the parents are of paramount importance.

Extremely premature babies who have normal brain scans and who are regarded as normal at followup by clinicians may still have cognitive, motor, sensory, emotional and health deficits.


Outcome by Gestational Age Table: the views of parents and doctors

A copy of the Outcome by Gestational Age Table and a questionnaire seeking parental views on 17 aspects regarding the table was sent to parents of babies less than 29 weeks and to neonatologist/perinatologists.

Outcome by Gestational Age Table: the views of parents and doctors


Return to the Preemie-L Home Page