|
|
|
|
Traditions and Transitions folk narrative in the contemporary world |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | main abstract index | main congress page |
| N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
A decade ago three major New Zealand newspapers carried
the provocative headline “US Expert Says Maori Culture Invented”. A flurry of
controversy ensued; many Maori were angered that unsympathetic Pakeha had been
handed apparently spurious information with which to discredit the fledgling
Maori cultural renaissance. The US expert was anthropologist Alan Hanson, and
the media story was based on an article written one year previously for the American
Anthropologist journal. Engaging with the premise that tradition serves to
validate the interests of its time by appealing to an inviolable or sacred
past, Hanson adduces evidence to demonstrate how, in the late nineteenth
century, anthropologically constructed Maori migration myths served an
ideologically assimilationist purpose by emphasizing Maori similarities to
European colonialist culture.
My paper focuses on the contemporary cultural politics that occurred when the
expert definition of the Maori migration myths was challenged by a cultural
outsider. I will argue that this case study demonstrates the limits of an
objectivist tradition invention anthropology. Hanson identifies Maori
engagement with migration myths in the very different environment of the
contemporary Maori cultural renaissance as only an example of the re-invention
of tradition. By contrast, I will argue that since Maori now attach radically
different political meaning to migration myths and assert cultural ownership
over them, this reclamation is much more significant: it is the historical
basis for a contemporary Maori political ideology. It is the nature, legitimacy
and structure of the state that is being reinterpreted through debate about
Maori tradition. Further, I posit that in postcolonial nations there can only
be tension between ideas of culture and identity that privilege heritage and
origin, and those that privilege new combinations and relocations. The
contemporary rearticulation of migration myths forms part of an ideology that
should be recognized not as inauthentic or helplessly dislocated, but as an
integral part of the re-association of Maori with their own history, from which
they have long been alienated.
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | main abstract index | main congress page |
| N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |