Australian Fluoridation News

THE FLUORIDE SPIN DOCTORS

By Glen S.R. Walker

The foundation of artificial fluoridation science has been a grand opportunity for Spin Doctors to earn their keep by their web of cunning messages to the not very intelligent professionals and politicians alike.

How these people love and believe the grand tales of the fluoridation Spin Doctors and the dental fairy tales, which they promote thinking it leads them into the holy realm of scientists.

Are Spin Doctors paid for their repeated authored fairy tales because there seems no other scientific productivity evidence.

Confidence in fluoridation professionals these days demands blindfolds and ear plugs. One must join the family of the three wise monkeys that do not see, hear or speak questioning the medical science of mass medicating populations with unregistered and unlicensed fluoride pollutants collected in exhaust chimneys of fertiliser factories.

None of these fluoride chemicals have been passed as safe for humans in fluoridated water by the Australian Official Regulatory Agencies such as the N.H.M.R.C. and the Therapeutic Goods Administration.

That Government Administration will soon be disbanded and replaced by a new organisation in partnership with New Zealand, so a powerful history on fluoridation chemicals will vanish - a rather convenient move?

The dental ubiquitous statement by these Spin Doctors must surely be their claim in dental literature that, "Nature thought of it (fluoridation) first."

If only doctors and dentists had been educated in a more general sense of "the actual", many of our health problems would never have been "invented" or manufactured, such as fluoridation. When dentists and their co-fluoridation promoters base their scientific understanding on such claims that "Nature thought of fluoridation first", it makes one wonder about their scientific arrogance in claiming this medical fluoridation principle was formulated by Nature.

The difference between dental Spin Doctors rhetoric and Reality of Nature is a difference between black and white with absolutely no grey tonings in the equation.

What is the actual TRUTH about Nature and fluoride

NATURE provided the greatest known medical human safety net against fluoride entering into breast milk fed to babies (the natural way of feeding a child)!

NATURE, spelt with a capital N, protects babies from fluoride poisoning.

No dentist, doctor or Health Department can deny the medical/Nature fact that no matter how much fluoride water a nursing mother consumes or fluoride from other sources, that fluoride does not transfer into breast milk, making a Nature formed safety net for babies.

The British Medical Journal 19th September, 1981 published an article, "No evidence of transfer of fluoride from plasma to breast milk".

They quoted:

"Recovery experiments showed no evidence that fluoride binds to the constituents of breast milk.

Hence the figures given for breast milk represent exclusively free fluoride.

These findings show that plasma fluoride is poorly transferred to breast milk and infants thus receive almost no fluoride during breast feeding."

(All arranged by Nature!)

Fluoridation History will, if ever printed for public scrutiny show appalling data from dental experts.

The Woman's Day, 4th April, 1960 published an article, "The Case of Fluoride". Professor Noel Martin, Associate Professor of Preventive Dentistry, Sydney University is quoted as follows:

"It can work wonders stopping tooth decay."

The Sydney Morning Herald 2005 contradicts that claim, showing the appalling state of dental decay in Sydney after 40 years of fluoridation.

Professor Noel Martin is quoted as saying:

"Babies from the time they're in their mother's womb until they're grown to children of 12 at least, benefit from it both ways. Adults' teeth are improved only from having the fluoride liquid in their mouths, they can swallow it, of course, but it won't do any special good or cause harm."

He is quoted saying:

"The Magic White chemical that is closely related to salt, but which can work wonders in stopping tooth decay especially in children."

An article 1985, "Breastfeeding Matters, a Review on the effects of milk on dental caries", Australian Journal of Dairy Technology, Dec. 1979, 179, quotes data from Professor E. Storey, Dean, Dental School, Melbourne University (often called the father of fluoridation in Victoria). He stated:

"Since the 1978 study, other studies have shown that the breast feeding baby seems to be actively protected from fluoride; despite deliberately increasing the amounts in maternal diet, only a tiny amount was present in breast milk."

"This might suggest that in evolutionary terms babies are not intended to get fluoride supplements until they are on a mixed diet or it may be one of mother nature's quirks that have no beneficial effect."

"Other things have changed since 1978. Fluoride was once considered an essential element for humans."

"In 1976 this was modified to essential or probably essential"; then in 1979 the U.S. F.D.A. deleted even that definition."

"So the belief that fluoride is essential has been altered, yet that belief underlies many assumptions about the safety of dosing children with a known toxin."

"As for infant tolerance levels, how do we know what they are?"

In spite of all the fluoridation rhetoric pumped into the medical and dental world by Spin Doctors preaching the Gospel according to their presentation, all of which is unfounded medical science.

This is free information to dentists and doctors, we do not charge nor are we paid to educate professional fluoridation "experts".

Nature and Fluoride

Did Nature arrange for fluoride to be 'naturally' in all water, making it a "natural necessary nutrient", safe and necessary for human life?

The Creator, Nature, could not have thought so!

A leading Melbourne "Natural" Scientist recently stated:

"I get to know God best through Nature."

From the beginning of human life, "Nature" designed the female body by arranging a physiological barrier which prevents the passage of fluoride from mothers' blood into her breast milk, thus protecting the baby from fluoride poisoning and all by Nature.

The Fluoride Spin Doctors print and extol their scientific understanding of chemistry and Nature by claiming most drinking water supplies have  a natural fluoride content.

Once again we must go to the source or beginning of these claimed naturally fluoridated waters.

Seems they all believe and want you to believe that rain and snow are fluoridated but not explaining how the fluoride chemicals are introduced before the rain - water - arrives on Earth!

The Australian Dental Journal 1966:41 published an article "Fluoride content of infant formulae in Australia" by Silvia and Reynolds, School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne, in which they stated:

"In Australia dental fluorosis has increased. A recent Western Australian Study, 48.4 percent of 7-8 year old children examined exhibited fluorosis of their maxillary permanent central incisors.

This represented a 100 percent increase in a similar study three years earlier."

The fact is that original water is free of fluoride but some water collects fluoride as a pollutant from rocks and soil as it flows on Earth because water is a good solvent (having power to dissolve) and forms a changed type of water - a polluted solution.

With the fluoride collected as a pollutant it changes clean water into a totally different chemical complex of impurities.

Many years ago children were given Nature Studies in schools, seems these simple studies should be part of professional education today.

The dental fluoride pushers place much of their "spin" by using the World Health Organization (WHO) as a scientific pillar of authority.

Perhaps from the following criteria by the W.H.O. one can glean some democratic science, lots of common sense, and in fact part of the Australian "sleeping" Law.

Ethical Criteria by W.H.O.

"The issue in all societies is:

What is proper behaviour, Ethical criteria for drug promotion  (fluoridation) should lay a foundation for proper behaviour concerning the promotion of medicinal drugs consistent with the search for TRUTHFULNESS and RIGHTEOUSNESS." (emphasis added)

(Ethical Criteria for medicinal drug promotion World Health Organization 1988)."

Fluoridation is a drug (F.D.A.)

The Criteria concludes with a statement that should be inscribed on the walls of Parliament and Courts of Law:

"The criteria should thus assist in "judging" if promotional practices related to medicinal drugs are in keeping with acceptable ethical standards."

Does compulsory artificial fluoridation meet these standards of Drug Behaviour?

You be the judge. Are these Ethical Standards the words, the principles of an organization (W.H.O.) that would consider mass medicating a population with a poison fluoride chemical that in world scientific literature names those fluoride chemicals as Enzymes inhibitors and destroyers!

Enzymes are the engine of the human body and anyone wanting to add this kind of poison to drinking water should be banned in any community.

It is scientifically dishonest if W.H.O. recommends artificial fluoridation as safe, effective, and that fluoridation qualifies in all statements and claims in their above Ethical Criteria!

After reading the above you may consider, 'enough said', but - there is more.

The following W.H.O. direction in their Criteria must surely be especially directed at the Fluoride Mafia.

"All promotion - making claims concerning medicinal drugs should be reliable, accurate, truthful, informative, balanced, up to date, capable of substantiation and in good taste.

They should not contain misleading or unverifiable statements or omissions likely to induce medically unjustifiable drug use or to give rise to undue risks.

The word SAFE should only be used if properly qualified."

That word "safe" is the most used and most popular expression by Dentists, Doctors, Politicians, together with all fluoridation promoters.

Strange democratic science, when after 50 years of fluoridation in Australia, and their prime selling ploy being - It's safe, but to this day our requests for REAL scientific proof of fluoridation "safety" published in World Scientific medical Journals has NEVER been produced (anywhere in the world).

Our Federation will support every word of the W.H.O. Criteria as above, and in its proper meaning, but any suggested recommendations for compulsory artificial fluoridation will be challenged by scientific medical FACTS together with Australian Law.

Fluoride Spin Doctors and "their" dental patients do not qualify in any way under the W.H.O. Ethical Criteria on drugs (fluoridation).

They are in reality the modern sorcerers making gold out of their garbage.

Come aboard the Fluoride Timeless Dental Shuttle. It only goes backwards into the darkness of unreality.

A study of this Timeless Shuttle shows the beginning of artificial fluoridation of water supplies was based on warnings that wherever one lived in a non-fluoridated town, that town's community "had the worst dental decay in the country", indeed sometimes "the worst in the world". Hundreds of towns all around the world, all with the "worst" dental decay!

That catch-cry, called science by dentists, has been presented in the unfluoridated places in Australia as a reason for compulsory mass medicating the people with fluoridated drinking water and all without scientific proof of its safety.

Dentists in Australia are claiming Switzerland took fluoride out of their drinking water supplies and replaced it with fluoride in salt.

It is disturbing to read professional opinion that its good to eat plenty of salt, and so get a daily dose of fluoride from the salt. The simple TRUTH is universal medical understanding that salt is not a good diet constituent, so it seems "they" believe adding another toxic fluoride chemical to salt makes it a double-barrel magic bullet.

For many years the Australian Fluoridation News has been challenging the Fluoride Spin Doctors to show the daily pharmaceutical dose of fluoride in all sections of a community.

Now comes the 2005 dental "science", that suggests the same quantity of fluoride is ingested by people in Switzerland from table salt compared with fluoridated water.

It should be the responsibility of the Government and its Regulatory Agencies to control the spin science misinformation delivered to the public via dental "experts".

The matter is a simple equation. If compulsory mass medication with fluoride chemicals via kitchen taps does not succeed, it will result in the long-term world planned control by drugs in public water being defeated and the collapse of a mighty wealthy giant.

Back to top