Energy Action Group
What’s
in an offer? – What makes you an attractive or unattractive customer!
Buyer
Beware!
(This section is still under
construction – last updated 14 January 2002)
The first key issue is to understand the
‘offer’ being made. The offer is different from the ‘contract’. You must ensure
that the offer is correctly represented in the contract when it arrives. You must
also understand the terms and conditions that are outlined in the contract.
Direct debit – if you agree to direct debit
and there is insufficient funds in your bank account when the retailer debits
your account, you will liable for bank charges. Bank charges are commonly
between $20 and $50! Remember, if you pay the bill quarterly there are 4 times
a year in which you could be caught short with not enough money in your bank
account – even getting caught once could wipe out any benefits in doing direct
debit. For those people on low fixed incomes like pensions and Newstart
allowances there is both a greater risk of incurring bank charges, and losing
the discretion in when you actually pay the account. For example, if you need
to buy medication unexpectantly, the money may have already gone from your
account to the electricity retailer leaving you short and unable to buy the
medicine or because you’ve taken money out to pay the chemist, the direct debit
may ‘bounce’.
Find out what is going to be printed on
the bill. You, as the customer need to know the break down of charges
especially the underlying distribution costs. The distribution costs differ
between regions and may account for differences in offers. You also want to see
on every bill the distinction between distribution and energy costs, between
kilowatt per hour charges and standing charges. It is not advisable to accept a
contract that minimises this type of information. Retailers argue that each
extra piece of information on the bill costs them money to put it on. The real
reason is to keep customers ignorant.
How long do you
wanted to be contracted for?
Penalties may apply if you want to end
the contract prior to the agreed expiry date.
Before trading
away things like the consumption graph (retailers are very keen to see it go
because they want customers to consumer more not less) think about how the
graph helps you understand how much you use (and the environmental
implications), but also how it helps you budget.
What are the retailers interested in?
- If it is your current retailer they want you to stay with them.
They are likely to offer you a little something to stay but not a lot (eg
movie tickets). They don’t want to spend on customers they already have
because the reality is most people will probably not bother changing
suppliers (this is the experience of telephones and internationally in
electricity).
- They will make better offers to other retailers customers – but
only to those customers who they know will realise them good profits –
customers that use a lot, may be willing to buy non-energy products, and
are reliable payers (preferably direct debit)
- Retailers like direct debit because it comes close to
guaranteeing them payment. It also shortens their cash flow cycle which
saves them money (in effect retailer are extending their customers credit
because they give us the electricity before we pay for it). The ultimate
goal of electricity companies is to have customer pay before they use.
This is one reason why they are always trying to get ‘pre-payment meters’
introduced. The other reasons they like pre-payment meter is because it
saves them sending out accounts and doing the meter reading. One of the
most traditional reasons is because people on pre-payment meters have to
disconnect themselves if they cannot afford to pay and the utility no
longer has to be seen as having any responsibility. Moreover, as people
disconnect themselves and the problem of poverty is hidden, government and
communities are denied the knowledge of the problem. In EAG’s view
electricity and gas are essential services and should be available to all
– pre-payment meters do not deliver electricity to all and hence should be
opposed.
- Retailers like direct debit because then they do not have to pay
for a network of agencies at which customers can pay (remember the old
days when you could talk to a customer service centre face to face?). At
the present time retailers are required to maintain places at which people
can pay in person. Mostly this is being able to pay at post offices.
However, the retailers claim that this is expensive. In effect people are
paying a fee to pay over the counter (this is discriminatory towards those
unable or unwilling – like the elderly - to have direct debit
arrangements). Over time it is likely only a small number of people will
pay at the post office, and that an ‘official’ fee will be introduced. One
of the problems is that as a smaller number of people are being serviced
this way the cost per person rises. We call this being caught in a
‘residual market’.
- The aim of retailers is to shorten the ‘collection cycle’ as
much as possible. That is, have you pay as soon as possible. The less the
number of meter reads and bill issues the higher the profit for them. As
the market develops it is possible that customers will be offered deals in
which they are directly directed each fortnight but only have their meter
read once a year and are sent only one bill each year. This happens to
also be a good way for customers to lose any notion of how much they are
consuming and hence tend towards consuming more rather than less.
EAG home