
Home | Examples | Logistics | About cohousing | | Tools | Contact me
The following
table illustrates the optimal path of a cohousing project:
|
2. Planning
|
3. Execution
|
|
Participate in workshops which develop a
shared understanding of:
For example, members may be surprised at the lack of local or
state government subsidies, or disappointed at the modest savings derived
from economies of scale. Research shows that the purchase of a house is
rarely cheaper. On a positive note, the cost of living in cohousing often
lower, and the creative process can be fun! The planning process should lead to:
|
A clearly formed group, and well-planned
process will lead to:
Consider
the difference in negotiations with a real estate agent when you have a
cohesive & funded group, versus a group which is yet to get emotional
& financial buy-in. Even
the most cohesive groups will be competing with developers, and members do
well to consider Chris
ScottHanson’s pragmatic advice as described in his Cohousing Handbook. |
Hans Tilstra, April 2008