| Uniya - Jesuit Social Justice Centre | CONTENTS | Spring 1995 |
Jesuit Social CentresIn April and May, Peter Hosking SJ visited Jesuit Social Centres in India, the Philippines, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan and Korea. |
Asia Brief |
The Jesuits have an excellent structure for international research and action. Worldwide, the 25,000 Jesuits are divided into 10 Assistancies of about 10 Provinces each. Typically each Province includes 250 Jesuits and a range of apostolates.
It is helpful to link local experiences of injustice with competent social analysis and theological reflection. |
Many of these apostolates are staffed by Jesuits and lay or religious
partners, who work close to the struggle of the poor and are in contact
with experts in social welfare and policy. The Jesuits' structures have
great potential for networking to promote justice, touching many levels
of society and church.
In practice, Social Centres can become preoccupied with local and national issues. Yet increasingly, global communications and economic forces impact on issues at home. For instance, many Centres have direct experience of issues concerning migrant workers, human rights abuses, child labour, tribal struggles, suppression of workers' organisations, forced movement of peoples, ecological degradation, and oppressive political regimes. All emphasise the importance of NGO networks and partnerships in working for change. |
Some Centres are concerned that the WTO and other trade agreements lack any strong social charter, focusing instead on trade and economic development. Common concerns are that:
Some Jesuit Centres educate leaders in social action, promoting cooperatives, credit unions, labour organisations and farmers' groups. The Indian Social Institutes in New Delhi and Bangalore and SEARSOLIN in the Philippines have trained many community development leaders.
Some Centres work in grassroots social action, some through training
institutes and some in advocacy research. Some are academic in emphasis,
others pastoral. Some lobby within church structures, others more
broadly. There is some stress between those who work at local animation
level and those engaged in large training centres or policy research.
These tensions can be creative.
Collaboration across countries can be difficult for Centres functioning at the grassroots, where the poor determine their own development model. Yet it is still helpful to link local experiences of injustice with competent social analysis and theological reflection. International solidarity and lessons shared may be critical elements in the changing of unjust realities.
Above material is from the Uniya Newsletter: used with permission.
The Cardoner,
© Copyright 1995 by Jack Otto.