|
Ian Hancock
John Gorton: He Did It His Way
Hodder Headline, $50hb, 446pp, 0 7336 1439 6
ROBERT
MENZIES CAST such
a large shadow that the contribution of his immediate successors
has tended to be belittled, if not forgotten altogether. Each of
the three is remembered mostly for things unconnected with their
prime ministerships: Harold Holt for the manner of his death; John
Gorton for his drinking and rumoured philandering; and William McMahon
for the shapeliness of his wife's legs. Until now, each has suffered
from not having had a decent, retrospective biography.
Yet
together, the three of them successively led Australia through seven
of its most tumultuous years. They presided over a society in which
the generation of postwar baby boomers were demanding wide-ranging
social changes and an end to the fear-driven politics of the Cold
War. Holt had been Menzies's anointed successor, and may have been
able, with the help of his bikini-clad daughters-in-law, to bridge
the wide gap between the Depression and the Hair! generations.
But it was not to be. When Holt disappeared without trace in the
surf in December 1967, the gnome-like figure of his Treasurer, Billy
McMahon, seemed certain to step into his shoes until the formidable
Country Party chief, `Black Jack' McEwen, stipulated that he would
not serve under McMahon. The Liberal Party was faced with the daunting
task of finding another leader from among the crop of second-rankers
who put their hands up. Although the erudite Paul Hasluck appeared
to be the front runner, the rather stuffy historian was reluctant
to sully his hands by fighting for it. This gave John Gorton his
unexpected chance.
So
it was that a process of unexpected tragedy, political veto and
happenstance allowed the relatively unknown senator to snatch the
prime ministership. As Gough Whitlam loftily observed: `for the
first time, the House of Representatives has been unable to provide
the leader of a major Australian political party.' Just as he was
an outsider in the prime ministerial race, Gorton, as Ian Hancock's
new biography shows, was something of an outsider throughout much
of his life.
Born
out of wedlock, it remains unclear whether Gorton was born in Melbourne,
as a birth certificate would suggest, or in New Zealand, as his
father later claimed. Whatever his birthplace, he always had this
burden of shame, caused by his `bastard' status in a relatively
prudish society. He was raised by his maternal grandparents and
later, after the untimely death of the mother he hardly knew, placed
in the care of his father's estranged wife to live with a sister
he had not known existed. Then he was sent off to boarding school.
For
all the emotional impoverishment of these formative years, Gorton's
later childhood was not marked by material impoverishment. He lived
for a time on Sydney's North Shore and was sent to one of its best
schools before fetching up at Geelong Grammar. He became a prefect
under the beneficent tutelage of its influential headmaster, James
Darling, who suggested to Gorton that one day he might become prime
minister. And it was Darling who pressured Gorton's father into
sending young John off to Oxford, presumably so that he might have
a chance of fulfilling this destiny.
Hancock's treatment of those years in Oxford is disappointing. There
are details of Gorton's sexual relationship (his first) with an
older, married woman, but no reflection on what it might have meant
to Gorton. Other interesting questions are similarly left unexplored.
For instance, what effect did Gorton's experience in 1930s Oxford
have on his sense of Australian identity? What mental images of
Britain did he carry with him
to Oxford, and how did they accord with his experiences? Did his
three and a half years in England play any part in the political
development of this particularly Australian-minded prime minister?
This traditional political biography is strong on the internal workings
of the Liberal Party, on which Hancock has previously written, but
devotes little attention to Gorton's life outside politics. His
first wife remains a shadowy figure in the story, while his children
disappear completely from the time he enters the Senate until well
after his retirement. Nearly half the book is devoted to the three
years that Gorton, now ninety, was prime minister.
Despite
this, readers are regaled with details of what he might have eaten
during a summer trip to Spain and informed that it cost the Oxford
undergraduate a shilling to stay in a boarding house in Hull prior
to his working for two weeks on a fishing boat in the North Sea.
One wonders about the relevance of this. Was a shilling expensive
for the times? Does it matter? More interesting is the fact that
Gorton and his companion spent the night in a haystack on their
return journey to Oxford. That at least says something about young
Gorton. There are several other lapses of historical discernment,
such as when we are told that padded postal bags were introduced
in 1970, as if that were significant.
Gorton returned from his days at Oxford with a respectable second-class
honours degree and an American wife, Bettina. It should have been
a triumphant homecoming, but he was greeted on the Melbourne wharf
by a father who was clearly unwell and who died the following year.
Hancock briefly sets out the facts of what must have been a trying
time for Gorton, the death of a father whom he was said to have
`idolised' but who was forever disappearing from his life. Now he
had gone for good, leaving Gorton a legacy of a debt-burdened orange
orchard near Kerang in northern Victoria. It would have been helpful
to know the emotional effect on Gorton of the death of this man
who, Hancock suggests, bordered on being a con man and who always
`lived on the brink of a fortune, that never quite materialised'.
Gorton was forced to abandon the journalistic career that his father
had arranged for him. Undaunted, he set out with his wife and revived
the fortunes of the orchard, dislodging his father's mistress. And
there the story might have ended, had it not been for the Second
World War and its political aftermath.
It
was Chifley's attempt to nationalise the banks that propelled Gorton
into political life in 1949. Gorton's striking facial appearance
reminded voters of his wartime experience as a fighter pilot: in
a crash landing during the defence of Singapore, his face had been
smashed into the gun sight. Doctors did what they could to repair
the damage, but he was still left with the putty-faced look of a
second-rate prizefighter.
A staunch anti-communist and supporter of the White Australia policy,
Gorton in the Senate gave little indication of
his future rise to prominence. Prior to gaining the prime ministership,
he had served only as Navy Minister and then Education Minister,
and had a relatively low public profile. Hancock is particularly
strong on the political machinations that allowed Gorton, with the
strong support of the Country Party, to be anointed as leader of
the Liberals. They would come to rue their selection.
Gorton
distinguished himself as prime minister by adopting relatively nationalistic
stands on such matters as foreign investment and the future of Australia's
foreign and defence policies. They were stands that disturbed many
of his Liberal colleagues, as did his centralist tendencies in Commonwealth_State
relations, which saw him overruling the Queensland government to
protect the Great Barrier Reef. Such moves gradually eroded his
support within the party and made his eventual overthrow more likely.
However, as Hancock makes clear, it was probably his buccaneering
and relatively authoritarian political style that was his undoing.
This was exemplified by the appointment of the 22-year-old Ainsley
Gotto as his principal private secretary and his taking a 19-year-old
female journalist along to a late-night briefing at the US Embassy.
Both actions scandalised some of his more censorious colleagues
and caused headlines in the press. It was not the suggestion of
womanising per se that prompted the outrage. It was that
he had allowed his apparent proclivity to besmirch his high office.
Gorton's
suitability for the top job was tested at the 1969 election, which
saw the Labor Party's vote, under Whitlam, rise by nearly seven
per cent. When the Senate election in 1970 underlined the slump
in government support, the critics sharpened their knives. After
his fall from power in March 1971, Gorton became a vitriolic critic
of his successor, McMahon, and an unforgiving hater of Malcolm Fraser,
the erstwhile supporter who had done much to bring him down. It
is Fraser who is now out in the cold, as far as the Liberal Party
is concerned, and Hancock loses few opportunities to take a swipe
at him.
Hancock's
authorised biography paints a portrait of a politician who some
said could have been a great prime minister had he not been brought
down by lesser mortals. Not that this is hagiography, for Hancock
concedes the failings that would rob Gorton of any claim to greatness.
He was a devil-may-care politician who found himself shoved to the
front, only to be caught out of his depth. By his own admission,
Gorton took to drink to cover his confusion. An accidental prime
minister, he became an accident waiting to happen.
|