|
Mungo
MacCallum
Mungo:
The Man Who Laughs
Duffy
& Snellgrove, $28pb, 292pp, 1 876631 147
BY
THE TIME I arrived in Canberra in the late 1970s, Mungo MacCallum
was already a legend in his own lunchtime, which, as he admits in
this latest book, 'frequently dragged on towards sunset'. He was
famed for introducing a new style of political journalism into Australia:
irreverent, opinionated, witty, at times scurrilous. He was impatient
of cant, and punctured pomposity. These qualities are all apparent
in Mungo: The Man Who Laughs. It is avowedly neither
autobiography nor history. It is an odd hybrid, divided distinctly
into two parts: a set of autobiographical sketches devoted to his
early life, laced with politics and laughter; and a personalised
chronicle of the age of Gough Whitlam.
The
scion of two great Sydney families the Wentworths and the
MacCallums Mungo has fun with the aristocratic family tree,
complaining of 'worn-out genes' and holding up for inspection a
truly bizarre collection of relatives. His immediate family was
rather dysfunctional: an alcoholic, Labor-leaning father, absent
much of the time either at war or drying out; and a rather anonymous
mother, perhaps too significant a figure for mockery. He skirts
the traumas of family life, but his obsessive hunt in later life
for a big brother in the surrogate, rather than the Orwellian,
sense suggests how deep were the wounds. He first latched
on to the novelist George Johnston as 'the wise and experienced
elder brother I never had', and then the great editor of The
Australian, Adrian Deamer, 'became the second of my big brother
substitutes'. The attachment to Gough Whitlam was the last, the
most adult and the most enduring of these relationships.
His
schooldays at Cranbrook were not happy; 'a gawky and asthmatic smart-arse',
he was an easy target for bullying. As with his relatives, his pen
comes to his rescue: the headmaster, a social climber and philistine,
'was a fossil and not altogether a convincing one at that: a sort
of pedagogic version of Piltdown man'. University life was mostly
extra-curricular theatre, revues, debating, Honi Soit;
these, combined with 'my pseudo-bohemian existence', all led
to a third-class honours degree in, of all things, mathematics.
Then came the obligatory world trip, across Asia to Greece, where
a pregnant girlfriend caught up with him. Marriage, an idyllic honeymoon
and fatherhood in Greece were followed by a rather bleak year or
so in England. The couple was rescued by their mothers, who brought
the young family back to Australia.
These
thin sketches are accompanied by a running political commentary
whose central theme is how Mungo came to love the Left. It was not
so much an intellectual as an emotional conversion, fuelled by distaste
for his conservative relations and the social snobbery of his conformist
school, and completed by the liberation of university life. A particular
epiphany came at the age of nine, during the referendum campaign
on banning the Communist Party. Young Mungo was waiting for his
mother outside a shop when a woman climbed a ladder and began to
harangue the crowd. 'She turned an eagle eye towards me. "Do
you want," she screamed accusingly, "the secret police
to have the right to break down the doors of your home and carry
you off to jail without trial?" A moment's thought convinced
me that I did not.'
This
juxtaposition of the political and the personal is an unsatisfactory
one, the former frequently attenuating the latter. Political passages
are often introduced at a point when the personal becomes too fraught
or unbearable. It is as though 'the man who laughs' is fearful of
tears. An unusual paragraph in which he puzzles as to why his mother
clung to her marriage for twenty years is followed immediately by
a section on Chifley, Menzies and bank nationalisation. '[P]retty
broke and pretty miserable' in 'a lightless downstairs flat in Shepherd's
Bush', relief comes through the Profumo affair and a discussion
of the advantages of compulsory voting. This is politics as escapism.
In
the second half of the book, the political is allowed to overwhelm
the personal. In it, we have the tale of how Gulliver Whitlam conquered
his Lilliputian rivals; how he was made vulnerable by his own flaws
and even more so by those of the men around him; and how he was
destroyed when 'Kerr ejected prematurely'. There are some personal
reflections on journalism, but the personal is now so sketchy that
even Mungo's major liaisons are difficult to decipher. The style
is as supple and vivid as ever, pen portraits are memorable, and
there are some wonderful set pieces, although much of it seems a
reprise of material from his Nation Review days. I suspect
I will not be alone in preferring the immediacy and the pointed
details of those articles, collected in earlier MacCallum publications,
to this nostalgic tale. Or perhaps, as the graffiti warns: 'Nostalgia
ain't what it used to be.'
The
book peters out with the fall of Whitlam. Mungo seems to have coped
less well with the trauma of 1975 than even the Labor Party. He
lingered on in Canberra into the 1980s but found Hawke's Labor unsympathetic:
'above all it lacked pizzazz.' All that was left was nostalgia for
the Whitlam years, 'when no vision had seemed out of reach and no
reform unattainable, when every day was another walk along the high
wire to either glory or disaster'. So he packed up his bags and
his pen and sought paradise in Brunswick Heads.
Like
all great clowns, Mungo MacCallum has probably a tragic perspective
on the predicament of humankind, but, in this book, the clown's
grinning mask remains mostly in place. Yet the epigraph from Bertolt
Brecht hints at the truth: 'The man who laughs has not yet been
told the terrible news.' When Mungo MacCallum faces fully 'the terrible
news' about himself, which he touches upon in this memoir but avoids
by escaping into laughter and politics, then we could get one of
the great Australian autobiographies. We might even learn if he
really found paradise in Brunswick Heads.
|