One
more falling body
Brenda Niall
In September
1985 , when I visited the Hospital of the Blue Nuns in Rome to
see the room in which Martin Boyd died, I never thought to check
the height of the windows, nor to cross-examine the calm and affable
Sister Raphael Myers, with whom I looked at Boyds last view
of the city. If anything was fully documented in my biography
(Martin Boyd: A Life, 1988) it was his final illness and
death.
It was midday, so my diary reminds me: the only time when the
room would be empty before the next admission. The hospital was
a cool, quiet place, air-conditioned, I think, with windows closed
against Romes heat. Sister Raphael remembered Boyd, but
she hadnt been on duty when he died. She could tell me nothing
that I didnt already know from Boyds diaries or from
the testimony of the friends who had visited him. A difficult
patient? All patients are a little difficult; one
expects that. I went on to lunch in the Borghese Gardens,
feeling that I had done a biographers duty on my last day
in Rome.
Now, confronted with an extraordinary claim in Darleen Bungeys
biography of Arthur Boyd, I could regret that my notes are not
more detailed. According to Bungey, the death of Arthurs
uncle Martin was suicide. The 78-year-old novelist, dying of cancer
in June 1972, had thrown himself out of his hospital window. His
broken body was found in the garden (Bungey, page
480). In a biography replete with the word perhaps,
there is no suggestion of doubt. Broken in spirit, broken body:
thats the way it went.
But did it? The source is an unnamed person who told Boyds
niece Mary Perceval that the belief was that Martin Boyd
had committed suicide (Bungey, page 600). On the flight
to Rome to arrange the funeral, Mary passed on this report to
her sister-in-law Yvonne, wife of Arthur Boyd (who was travelling
overland from London to join them).
To get a clearer picture, I telephoned Yvonne Boyd. She said that
Mary had been very upset; they did not discuss the matter. They
went to the hospital, where the nuns gave us a lovely lunch
and asked if we would like to see the body. This offer (remarkably
nonchalant, if there had been a suicidal leap) was refused. Yvonne
and Mary shrank from seeing what they assumed would be a badly
smashed body.
Why was there no talk, within the Boyd family or outside it, about
the manner of Martins death? Today, younger members are
astonished by the story. Perhaps Mary managed to unsee
it. Yvonne suggested, in a reference to the Christian Science
faith in which Mary and her brothers and sister were brought up.
But what if she and Mary were needlessly distressed by misinformation
from that unnamed person in Rome?
Could Martin Boyd have thrown himself out? It is almost beyond
belief that he could have opened a window, or climbed onto a sill.
Could he have walked or stumbled into air? If there had been French
windows, left open, perhaps he might, but there were not. A recent
e-mail from writer Desmond OGrady in Rome established that
the window sills would have been about waist-high on Boyd, who
was nearly six feet in his prime.
Geoffrey Dutton, who visited Boyds pensione on 10
May 1972, recorded his frailty: so thin and tufted and white
as if he were made from pipe cleaners, yet with such a bright
eye. Two maids helped him from a chair in the sitting room
back to his bed. Squeezing teabags with a spoon was beyond his
strength: Dutton did it for him (Out in the Open, 1994,
pages 39394).
I get weaker & weaker and can only hope to die soon,
Boyd wrote on May 27. Bungey offers these words as evidence of
his crushed spirit, ignoring the rest of the diary
entry for the same day. It records his being given absolution
and a blessing by Father John Guidera of the Church of San Silvestro,
who then received him into the Catholic Church. On May 30 he told
his RC friends who were very pleased about
his conversion. On May 31 the Anglican Nuncio to the Holy See
called in and they had a wonderfully helpful talk.
A wise and good nun sat with Boyd during a dreadful
night; and she restored my peace, he wrote on
June 1. He died two days later.
An independent man who never gave anyone any trouble, would Martin
Boyd have chosen a death which would distress his friends, leave
his family the stigma of suicide, and perhaps endanger the Christian
burial he had planned for himself? The broken bodies he had seen
during his World War I service left him with an abhorrence of
violence of any kind. Suicide, which he would have seen as the
denial of Gods goodness, was against his deepest beliefs,
just reaffirmed by his profession of faith.
An accidental death? Confused patients, under the effects of medication,
do get out of bed, wander, fall down fire escapes, even fall from
windows. I would not call that suicide, and it is suicide that
Bungey claims. She is sure that Boyds spirit was broken;
she even knows that he was found below his window.
Assuming a fatal fall, why was there no inquest? A cover-up, involving
a falsified death certificate, would be difficult and risky in
this busy hospital. The private diaries and letters of close friends
such as the former Australian ambassador to Italy, the astute
and well-informed Sir Walter Crocker (who advanced Boyds
hospital payments in 1971) and the Anglican Church Times editor
Alan Shadwick, have nothing to say about suicide or accident.
Desmond OGrady, who knew Boyd well and was helpful to Mary
Perceval, sent the news of his death from stomach cancer
to the Sydney Morning Herald and later wrote about his
burial as a Catholic in Romes Protestant Cemetery. Would
an experienced journalist like OGrady have missed the suicide
story? Why didnt Bungey ask him? Why, during our many conversations,
didnt she ask me?
Puzzling over all this, I made a lucky guess and found a deathbed
witness. Father John Guidera wrote to Canberra academic Dorothy
Green on 14 June 1972: Poor old Martin passed away very
peacefully and quite suddenly in the end. I was with him a couple
of hours before he died (Papers of Dorothy Green, National
Library of Australia).
Every life has its mysteries. Every biography has gaps. Biography
depends on the assessment of evidence, and on empathy and imagination.
But a leap of the imagination can get the biographer into trouble.
This one gets Martin Boyd an unearned place in his painter nephews
iconography (Icarus, Hinkler and Uncle Martin, Bungey,
page 487) as one more falling body.
How much do they matter, Martin Boyds last moments? It is
of course the life that is important. But Bungeys account
is misleading in more than one way. Because she has this presumed
suicide in mind, she con-structs a matching figure. In a bizarre
comparison with Keats another sickly, lonely, self-exiled
writer she forgets a few differences between the
frail poet who died from tuberculosis at twenty-six and Martin
Boyd, healthy and vigorous to the age of seventy-eight, when struck
by cancer.
Elsewhere in the biography (pages 4546), Bungey makes Boyd,
most improbably, a Wicked Uncle, whose machinations
at the time of his mothers death in 1936 cruelly disadvantaged
the Merric Boyd family. Not a shred of evidence is produced to
show how this was done. Bungey has misread the will of Emma Minnie
Boyd, forgotten two of the five beneficiaries, and not considered
the fact that in 1936 Martin Boyd was living in a Sussex village,
with no telephone and little chance of plotting with anyone in
Melbourne. In the 1950s, as Bungey shows, he acted with great
generosity towards the same nieces and nephews.
As wicked uncle, kind uncle and sickly despairing uncle, Martin
Boyds characterisation in Bungeys text bears out the
truth of Janet Malcolms comment in Two Lives: Gertrude
and Alice (2007) on the fate of minor characters in biography.
They are often victims ofa kind of narcissism on behalf
of the subject which blinds the biographer to the full humanity
of anyone else. Once they have performed their function
of advancing the narrative, they are carelessly dropped.
Brenda Nialls memoir, Life Class: The Education of a
Biographer, was published in 2007. Her previous publications
include Martin Boyd: A Life (1988) and The Boyds: A
Family Biography (2002).
|
|
|
|
More
current reviews
Editorial:
Dishonouring our writers
'The
proportion of literary recipients is small,
declining. (Compare it will sportsmen and
-women and one's spirit wilts.) In recent years
practically everyone cited for "service to
literature" has had another significant career.'
Read
full review.
Peter
Rose on Peter Carey's His Illegal Self
'It
is hard to become excited about Peter
Carey's new novel, and that is a hard notion
to entertain. We are used to being tested,
and vastly entertained, by Carey.'
Read full review.
Richard
Walsh on Bruce
Dover's
Rupert's Adventure's in China
'Murdoch was raring to take China by storm.
But, as Dover tells it, his Long March
ultimately ended in a rout equivalent to that
which drove the Kuomintang to their
Formosan redoubt.' Read
full review.
Daniel Thomas on
Sidney Nolan
'The recent AGNSW exhibition of Nolan's
paintings, by in-house curator Barry Pearce,
generally confirms the excellence of the work,
but downgrades certain phases: no Gallipoli
series, no Oedipus, no Eureka stockades,
no Auschwitz ovens, no Adelaide lady heads.'
Read
full review.
|