Time
warp
Peter Rodgers
Michael Burleigh
Blood and Rage: A Cultural History of Terrorism
HarperPress, $60 hb, 545 pp, 9780007241279
Whether they be Irish Fenians, Russian revolutionaries, the guilty
white kids of Italys Red Brigade or (then) West Germanys
Baader Meinhof gang, African National Congress members fighting
to end apartheid, Palestinian gunmen, al Qaeda bombers, or an
assortment of other evil-doers, Michael Burleigh sets out the
terrible things that human beings can do to one another. He provides
much information about what happened or allegedly happened,
and points the finger in all directions at individuals,
groups and governments alike. Few are spared his disdain.
Unfortunately, the why is largely missing in action in this long
book. It rests heavily on the idea that all terrorist acts are
the work of nutcases. In Burleighs world view, anyone, especially
in the West, who seeks to understand motivation must be, at best,
a liberal sissy or, worse, filled with malevolent, fellow-traveller
intent.
The declaratory, polemic tone is set in the books first
pages. Burleigh comments that the cliché of yesterdays
terrorist being tomorrows statesman does not get us very
far. That may well be true, but the cliché provides an
important dose of both moral and political complexity to any meaningful
discussion of terrorism. Burleigh adds that if you
imagine that Osama bin Laden is going to evolve into Nelson Mandela
you need a psychiatrist rather than an historian. Maybe
I have missed something, but I am not aware of a groundswell of
argument that such a transformation might, can or indeed should
happen. The point is that Nelson Mandela the terrorist evolved
into Nelson Mandela the statesman, as did quite a few others,
also tainted with violence.
Undeterred by any notion of fine lines or demonstrable transitions,
Burleigh charges on, declaring that the milieu of terrorists is
invariably morally squalid, when it is not merely criminal.
What is more, endless studies of terrorist psychology reveal
that they are morally insane, without being clinically psychotic.
It must be a real comfort to have Burleighs world view,
in which those who do nasty things, and the individuals or governments
who abide, abet or at least dont stop them, invariably are
either evil or just plain useless. But it suggests perhaps the
need for a good historian as well as a good psychiatrist.
Burleigh has marshalled an enormous amount of, at times, fascinating
detail. We have to take much of it on face value which, given
his racy style, is fine up to a point. In excoriating Iran in
the early days of the Islamic revolution, he speaks of the mass
hysteria employed by the clerics to mobilise martyrs for the eight
years of total war with Saddam Husseins Iraq. It would not
have been amiss to mention here that Iraq, with American and other
Western support, had actually attacked Iran. A little later in
the book, in the same long chapter on Islamist terrorism, Burleigh
refers to the fifty-five Palestinians murdered by the fanatical
Jewish settler Baruch Goldstein in early 1994. The actual figure
was twenty-nine. In this era of Googleisation such
detail would not have been hard to check.
The chapter on Islamist violence ends the book, with Burleigh
demanding that the fight be taken to Muslim societies over Islams
role in the non-Muslim world. Its operation there, he asserts,
should
be directly related to how Muslim societies treat adherents of
other faiths, or people who espouse none. The British government
should flatly prohibit current plans to build a vast mosque in
east London, until such time as Churches are allowed to operate
in all Muslim countries without fear of persecution. Proselytism
should be based on a similar absolute quid pro quo. Allowing Wahhabism
to grow in our societies just because of lucrative aircraft contracts
[with Saudi Arabia] is an outrage.
Leaving
aside the religious contest implied here (a low-level crusade
perhaps), there is a certain appeal about the need to counter
the sleazy connection between Middle East oil wealth, politics
and arms deals. A window opened on this, for example, when Britains
Serious Fraud Office (SFO) began investigating an alleged slush
fund of some $130 million set up by the countrys biggest
defence contractor, BAE Systems, to provide members of the Saudi
royal family with lavish holidays, luxury cars and other necessities
of life. Saudi authorities reportedly hit the roof
when they learnt that a Swiss magistrate had been persuaded to
force disclosure of details of Swiss bank accounts. In late 2006,
however, the British attorney-general, Lord Goldsmith, announced
that the SFO was discontinuing its investigation.
This followed representations both to him and to the director
of the SFO concerning the need to safeguard national and
international security. Fortunately, the relief felt by
the British and Saudi governments and BAE must have soured considerably
in April 2008 when the High Court delivered a stinging rebuke
to the SFO. Discontinuing the investigation, the court said, may
have avoided uncomfortable consequences, both commercial
and diplomatic, but also aroused fear for the reputation
of the administration of justice if it can be perverted by a [commercial]
threat.
Burleigh urges, too, that non-Arab Muslim states should be encouraged
to contest the imperialist dominance
of Arabic and
Arab authorities without making clear (wisely, perhaps)
who should do the encouraging. Certainly, there is documented
unease in the non-Arab Islamic world about aspects of Arabisation.
The former Indonesian president and noted Islamic leader, Abdurrahman
Wahid, has commented on the dangers of identifying oneself
with Middle Eastern cultures. The former Malaysian deputy
prime minister, Anwar Ibrahim, also publicly criticised the political
and social malaise of the Arab world. But urging Muslims broadly
to turn their back on the Middle East seems about as practical
as urging Christians to get over events in Bethlehem. Burleigh
concedes that Muslim fundamentalism is no more inherently
menacing than its Christian, Jewish or secularist equivalents.
We might well underline here that the greatest victims of Islamist
violence, by far, are other Muslims, the spectacular death toll
of 9/11 notwithstanding. Four thousand American military deaths
in Iraq pales into relative insignificance compared to the appalling
price that tens (or hundreds) of thousands of Iraqis have paid.
As an aside, we might note also that, based on annual crime statistics,
Americans are at greater risk from other Americans wielding golf
clubs and baseball bats than they are from Muslim terrorists.
Looking over the history of terrorism, Burleigh concludes that
any number of ideological causes which once fed violent
passions
have passed into oblivion. These things take time.
If he is correct that jihadist violence will eventually fade,
his suggestion that, based on the Cold War lifespan of 1947 to
1989, we are in the equivalent of 1953 is not much
comfort. It is even less so if we pretend that all terrorists
are psychotics operating in a moral and political vacuum. Al Qaeda
could not have turned Iraq into a university for terror without
substantial help from the White House.
Peter
Rodgers served as Australias ambassador to Israel in the
mid-1990s. His book on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Herzls
Nightmare: One Land, Two People, was published in 2004. He
is currently completing another book, Arabian Plights,
which explores the Arab world of the future.
|
|
|
|
More
current reviews
Stephanie
Green: Sarah Hay's Texas
'A great strength of this novel
is the way Hay
captures Susannah's feelings of ambivalence
about her new situation: the blur of exhaustion
and alienation through which she nurtures her
children and her husband; her loneliness;
the effort to keep some domestic order and to
discover a sense of herself'.' Read
full review.
Ian
Britain on Jeffrey's Smart's
Not Quite Straight
'What's
frustrating about this for readers is that
there are occasional signs of real verbal flair
(in such pungent phrases as "rumoured to be
vegetarians" or "a Bloomsbury bacchanal")
and of a capacity for set pieces that can grip
without recourse to social and sexual chit-chat.'
Read
full review.
|