Ming's
Legacy 
MEDIA
with Bridget Griffen-Foley
Australian
historians admire Robert Menzies. Pardon? Arent historians,
like the rest of the Australian academy, left-wing propagandists?
Dont they all loathe the prime ministers political
role model? Regardless of how historians view Menzies attitudes
to the monarchy, appeasement, the middle class and the Communist
Party, they have reached a consensus on one point: Menzies played
a significant role in the consolidation and expansion of Australias
university sector. When Ben Chifley laid the foundation stone
of the Australian National University during the election year
of 1949, Menzies refused to politicise the initiative; as prime
minister in 1956, he appointed a committee to inquire into the
plight of Australian universities and insisted on the provision
of life-giving funds by the Commonwealth government under conditions
which preserved university autonomy. As his biographer, A.W. Martin,
notes, Menzies support of universities, and the university
life, was never at any time in doubt.
In 1915 the Students Representative Council had recommended
to the University of Melbourne Council that Menzies, then a third-year
Law student, should be the 1916 editor of the Melbourne University
Magazine. At the University of Sydney, another Law student,
H.V. Evatt, was editing the universitys magazine, Hermes.
The boys from Jeparit and Maitland, born months apart, threw themselves
into uni-versity life, contributing poems and articles to the
publications they edited, involving themselves in debating, promoting
sport and acknowledging war service. They were to be foes at the
Bar and in parliament until 1965, when Menzies was a pallbearer
at Evatts funeral.
Many other student editors have also become notable journalists,
writers and polemicists. The roll-call includes Cyril Pearl, Geoffrey
Blainey, Donald Horne, Keith Windschuttle, Germaine Greer, Clive
James, Les Murray, Frank Moorhouse, Laurie Oakes, Morag Fraser,
Henry Rosenbloom and Kathy Bail. Numerous writers and politicians
were to be published for the first time in student publications.
This tradition, already under threat, is in danger of disappearing.
The Commonwealth governments Voluntary Student Unionism
(VSU) legislation, passed in 2005 and taking effect from 1 July
2006, prevents universities from collecting compulsory levies
not directly related to students courses. The government
refused to separate funding for represent-ative student bodies
from sports associations, clubs and other services. These services
include publications, whose fate was somewhat overlooked as the
Opposition parties and members of the National Party focused on
the predictably Australian preoccupation with sports facilities,
and with services such as child care and legal advice.
The impact on student publications of the Commonwealth governments
legislation has been swift and severe. Pulp (Southern Cross)
and Harambee (Edith Cowan) have ceased. Swinburne has withdrawn
funding for the weekly Swine, which is now considering
electronic publication. The university initially agreed to fund
the official student magazine, Tabula Rasa, but has since
withdrawn funding; the print run has been halved and the use of
colour minimised. The circulations of Honi Soit (Sydney)
and Vertigo (UTS) have also been cut, and Vertigos
editors have decided not to argue for their full honoraria. The
University of Queenslands Semper Floreat has gone
online.
The student medias attitude to advertising might best be
described as ambivalent. Many publications regard not running
advertising as critical to their autonomy. Swinburnes student
union believes that it may have to overturn its policy that no
more than twenty-five per cent of Tabula Rasa should consist
of advertising. Semper Floreats sell out
edition reported that sometimes no one wants to buy your
soul, even if it is going cheap: multinationals like Coca
Cola and News Limited had declined to sponsor a page at $1000
a pop.
VSU has pitted university administrations against student unions,
unions against newspapers, and newspapers against their natural
constituents. There have been debates about why already straitened
universities have chosen not to guarantee financial support for
newspapers, as they have with some other services. But the very
act of accepting this support may well lead to questions about
whether newspapers will still be free to criticise university
administrations; Pulps forthcoming replacement, to
be produced in partnership with the SCU School of Arts and Social
Sciences, will require university approval before going to press.
Some student unions have been lambasted for the alacrity with
which they elected to axe or prune newspapers.
This last point might attest to the fact that many students are
now so busy juggling paid employment with their studies (a trend
that will presumably accelerate with rises in HECS and full-fee
paying courses) that they do not have the time to embrace extracurricular
university activities. Student publications, as well as associations,
are very different from the days of Menzies and Evatt. It was
not until after World War I that political clubs and radical students
emerged at Australian universities; decades later, editors came
to be directly elected and paid stipends by student unions. As
Blainey has remarked, the history of student journalism is
a series of oscillations from left to right. Publications
were to become political weapons, blending passion, erudition
and satire to fight the battles of the Cold War and the Vietnam
War, and to flay apartheid and censorship. Full-year courses meant
that students, especially in the Arts, had fairly leisurely lives
and the time to embrace politics and journalism.
Now the very notion of communities centred on university life
has been all but dismantled. The editor-in-chief of Deakin Universitys
Crossfire Magazine feels like a slave to an organisation
that is now about counting money and nothing else.
John Howard often speaks of the need for better education in civics
and history. Perhaps he should read more about Menzies.
Bridget
Griffen-Foley is a historian at Macquarie
University. Her first article was published in the university's
student paper, Arena.
Download
print-friendly version
|
|
|
|
|
Current
reviews
Morag
Fraser
The ABC of Controversy
'Ken Inglis teases out motivation, formation,
influences. It is hard to make accurate predictions about what
these men and women will do, say or broadcast after reading Inglis's
accounts of them and where they have come from. A left-wing cabal?
Unlikely. There is too much counterfactual evidence.''
Read
full text
Peter Rose
Assassin in the Orchard: on Creme de
la Phlegm
'As with all forms of Australian cultural activity, it would be
easy to inflate local critical endeavour (its novelty, its scintillations,
its martial tendencies) and to forget that the history of acerbity
is longer than that of our peppy federation ... So will this book
help the cause, lift standards, raise consciousness? Is it unforgettable?
Maybe not. But the anthology preserves some fo our best and feistiest
critical writing in a culture not very good at doing that.' Read
full text
NEW:
THE
ABR FILM COLUMN
Nick Prescott
Celluloid junkies: on Candy, Little
Fish and Em 4 Jay
'Though we have
seen periods during which Australian cinema has been synonymous
with period-set narratives and idealised evocations of the outback,
there has always been a darker side to our cinematic imagination,
a gritty, hard-edged element that is just as crucial to this countrys
feature film output as are the sepia-tinged dreamscapes.' Read
full text
Delia
Falconer
Risky proximity: on Cate Kennedy's Dark
Roots
'Cate Kennedy's name will be familiar
to anyone who takes even the vaguest interest in Australian short
story contests ... With such a strong recognition factor, it seems
like a smart move by Scribe to publish her first collection. Not
only should it appeal to readers looking for new short fiction of
established quality, but also, presumably, to the thousands of writers
who enter short story competitions every year and who wish to see
the gold standard.' Read
full text.
Gail
Jones
A shape, if only a shape: on After Blanchot
'After Blanchot is a collection of
essays derived from a Melbourne conference organised in 2004 by
Monash University. For one who missed this splendid event, it is
exciting to see the calibre of the papers delivered and the audacious
range of positions ratified in its compass. This is a uniformly
brilliant collection of essays.' Read
full text
James
Ley
Through the looking glass: on Reflected
Light
'As
a nation, we are now so gloriously liberated from the tyranny
of political correctness that even taking part in a race riot
does not constitute evidence of racism. Reflected Light prompts
these thoughts less because of its content than the way Manne
and his co-editor, Peter Beilharz, define its purpose.' Read
full text
|
|