|
Chloe Hooper
A Child's Book of True Crime
Knopf, $35hb, 238pp, 1 74051 120 4
Ian Kennedy Williams
Regret
Penguin, $22pb, 267pp, 0 14 029527 5
THESE
TWO NOVELS can be read as intelligent manipulations
of the crime genre, exploring the inarticulacies
as well as the betrayals, real or imagined, that can precipitate
acts of violence. Chloe Hooper's impressive début, A Child's
Book of True Crime, explores, in her words, the twilight space
between childhood and adulthood'. The means for interrogating this
porous and ambiguous zone include a primary school teacher complicit
in her own infantilisation, school children with steadier insights
and clarity than their teacher, a faux children's story narrating
the details of a gruesome murder, and adults participating in games
of emotional brinkmanship that their children would probably play
as variants of chicken'. Regret, by contrast, is more concerned
with the isolation that occurs once the growing up ostensibly has
occurred. Whilst Chloe Hooper is at the beginning of a career with
the potential to produce exceptional work, the experienced Ian Kennedy
Williams is the more accomplished storyteller with Regret.
Three
levels of narration underpin A Child's Book of True Crime.
The principal narration is undertaken by Kate Byrne, a 22-year-old
school teacher who is having an affair with Thomas, the father of
a particularly gifted student, Lucien. She becomes increasingly
engrossed with the parallels
between her situation and the one described in the book Murder
at Black Swan Point, a true crime story of a wife who apparently
brutally murdered the woman with whom her husband was having an
affair. The author of Murder at Black Swan Point is Veronica,
wife of Thomas and mother of Lucien. The third narrative is a faux
children's book populated by such characters as Terence Tiger and
Kingsley Kookaburra, which contains forensic and eyewitness accounts
of the murder
at Black Swan Point.
Hooper's
book, whilst deserving of the high praise it has attracted, exhibits
regrettable weaknesses in character development and narrative structure.
Veronica is pretentious, cold and unmaternal. Kate invokes the authority
of child psychologists to make the point that the inspiration for
Lucien's blind, limbless, beheaded and bullet-ridden self-portraits
was likely to rest with his parents. Thomas is supercilious and
lacks affection or conscience. Unsurprisingly, Kate is the most
complex and sympathetic character, but she shows little inclination,
despite her adventures and intensifying paranoia, to grow up.
Hooper's story draws upon the technique of a children's book in
order to give her novel the right level of perversity' and the
means to examine the childhood-to-adulthood transition. The intentions
are sound but not always synonymous with effect. One is aware of
the children's chapters functioning as a device, more contrived
than perverse. Against such shortcomings in craft must be set the
vigour of Hooper's writing: its latent lyricism, well-timed tartness
of expression, the direct sensuousness of the observations, as when
Thomas
stared hungrily at my floral dress. Like a villain
in a silent movie, all his carnality registered in his eyes and
eyebrows.' One of the finest achievements of Hooper's first novel
is her acute appreciation of the language and irreverence of children.
She spent some four weeks in classrooms with a tape recorder talking
to fourth graders about philosophy and it shows:
Darren:
If you were in a dream, and you got in a fight and
had your head kicked off, you could pick it up and screw it
back on again.
Henry: You could play head soccer.
Lucien: If you played football with your head you'd actually
be at an advantage, because your eyes would be like a camera
and you could tell if it hit the post or not.
Alastair: The only bad thing about that is, you wouldn't
look so good after everyone had been kicking you around.
Danielle: You'd look better.
A
Child's Book of True Crime also touches on the power of narrative
to bring self-insight, although few of the adults in the book appear
encumbered with this quality. Kate observes that deeds of violent
and sadistic crimes are in our nervous systems. We read true-crime
to learn about ourselves.' And yet Kate's reading of true crime
leads her to rising paranoia. If the path to adulthood appears fraught,
the destination seems barely worth the effort.
With
such a prolific and varied writing background, Ian Kennedy Williams,
not surprisingly, steers clear of early-writing
foibles. Over the past twenty-four years he has written poems, short
stories, novels, scripts for radio and television, screenplays,
stage and video, in addition to a web-published novella.
Regret
moves between the present of a police investigation into the killing
of local Aboriginal Gonzo' Lever, set in the declining town of
Cedar, and the recent past of the shooting trip to nearby Regret
Falls, where he was killed. The official progress into uncovering
what happened is interspersed with chronological segments of the
disastrous pig-hunting expedition to the Falls. Themes of the oppression
of personal history, being trapped where one does not belong, racism
both explicit and inverse and sexual jealousy are
all developed in the book. This narrative structuring exacerbates
the suspense, with the two narratives ultimately coalescing at the
end of the book with the full revelation, rather than solution,
of the crime. The sense of rough justice meted out on the basis
of a false premise that underlies the killing extends to the final
resolution.
It's
hard to imagine a novel concerned with the psychological forces
provoking a crime that is not preoccupied, at least in passing,
with questions of identity. Such questions can be as forceful for
those who would or could not articulate them as for those who are
intrigued by them to the point of tedium. In exploring notions of
identity, Kennedy Williams is adept at exhibiting the limited nature
of his characters without resorting to the laziness of patronising
them. Nadine, the Cedar-born and -bred girlfriend of Matthew Wesker
who has left Sydney to teach in Cedar, becomes intrigued with Gonzo,
who has a black father and white mother. She gives Gonzo the benefit
of her views of black_white relations and personal identity:
What
I'm saying is, strip away all the complication shit, you've
still got to know who you are. You can't be a bit of this and
a bit of that. Okay, so you're made up of bits of this and bits
of that, but at the bottom of the bucket, mate, is the bit that
counts. The bit you started from. Or the bit you recognise as
basically who you are. D'you see what I'm saying?'
Yeah,'
Gonzo said, and it's crap.'
He
goes on to explain that he desires multiple identities black
days, white days' but that he is constrained by those who
see him as black first and white second. What counts is not how
he sees himself, but how those who call the shots see him: the premise
that regards him as able blithely to choose his identity is false.
More than identity, though, Regret is a study of isolation.
The mistress of the dark psychological causes of crime, Ruth Rendell,
made a highly plausible case years ago for the psychological and
social containment of illiteracy leading an apparently non-violent
person to commit serial murders. There is something of that in Regret.
Insularity and inarticulacy, and the subsequent failure to communicate,
lead to slights, real and imagined, and revenges that snowball into
self-destruction. The characters, for the most part strongly and
convincingly conveyed, are sequestered in their own space. However,
some of the portraits are a little overdrawn. The interminable vacillations
of Matthew, the central character, between the sanctimonious, theoretical
liberalism of his senior bureaucrat father and a desire to think
for himself, become grating towards the end. His self-loathing becomes
tedious because, like the other characters, he gives little promise
of progression.
Regret
is a substantial novel by an accomplished author. It has fewer flaws
but less charisma than A Child's Book of True Crime. The
greater anticipation must be reserved for Chloe Hooper's second
novel.
|