
Building a lathe from scratch is a complex and sometimes
frustrating task. In hindsight, I believe that a good second hand
propriety built machine can prove more satisfactory. However, I can
give the sum of my experiences in producing a unit which is versatile
and capable of producing high quality work.
Firstly you must determine the usage and scope of the proposed
machine. Is it to be used as a hobby lathe, perhaps once a week? Do
you propose to produce very small items, large items or a whole
range? The cost and complexity of the machine depends on these and
other factors.
Secondly, what metal working expertise do you have? Obviously you
must be able to handle quite a range of machinery or have a friendly
"tame" engineer. What access do you have to a well equipped metal
working workshop?
Unless you can satisfy your self on all these points, I would suggest
a shop bought unit would be more satisfactory.
My lathe was one of five built as a small "production" run by five
people. Not having ready assess to a metal shop, we persuaded the
local Technical College to run a course - "Wood Lathe Production".
The instructor had previously produced several small lathes, which to
my way of thinking, were too small and fragile to be any use to me. I
produced a set of specifications, some of which were not fulfilled,
mainly because the instructor, being a metal worker, did not
understand what really was required. So the result was a compromise.
Since then I have made a number of modifications which have resulted
in a very versatile and usable machine - more of this later.
All lathes are similar in basic design - they require a bed, a
headstock, tailstock and a tool post holder. Let's deal with them one
at a time.
Ideally this should be constructed of very heavy cast iron. In
a less than ideal situation there are two viable alternatives.
1 A pair of solid steel bars, either round or square.
2 A pair of heavy gauge square or oblong (preferably) steel
tubes.
As Ernie Conover would tell you, timber is another alternative, but
for really accurate work I don't think this is realistic. While
speaking of accuracy, I don't accept a commonly held belief that a
wood lathe doesn't need to be as accurate as a metal lathe.
Particularly with small work, accuracy is paramount.
I would suggest that a pair of 3" x 2" heavy gauge steel tubes would
be a good starting point. These can be cut to length, drilled and
fitted with spacers at the head and tail to leave a 1" space between
them. Check that your tubes are perfectly straight and when bolted
up, are perfectly parallel. Two short pieces of tube can be welded
across the bed tubes at each end to provide feet.
Again, ideally, this should be constructed of heavy cast iron
and have a 1" shaft and large diameter sealed bearings. You may be
able to pick up a headstock from an old metal lathe . In my case the
head was fabricated from steel plate and tube. The base and vertical
section were cut from ½" steel plate with a slot being milled in
the base plate into which the vertical plate fitted. This was jigged
up clamped and welded. The heavy steel tube which was to carry the
shaft and bearings was turned at each end to allow the bearings to be
inserted. A slot was milled out on the bottom of the tube and this
was fitted to the vertical section, clamped up and welded. The shaft
was turned to the bearing size and a 1" B.S.F. thread turned on one
end. The other end was turned down to ½" to allow the 3-ring
pulley to be fitted. Because of the shaft construction/design it was
not possible to include a No.2 Morse taper. This is a serious fault
and can be very limiting. It does mean that every accessory has to be
specially made. Apart from the external thread previously mentioned,
a hole was drilled and tapped into the business end of the shaft to
take the spur drive. The lack of a Morse taper in the headstock shaft
means that every accessory must be threaded to fit the external or
internal thread.
The body of this unit was constructed of similar
materials and in a similar way to the headstock. As before, the base
was slot milled and the vertical section fitted and welded. Two
heavy, threaded metal blocks were aligned on the vertical section to
which a threaded shaft was fitted. A handwheel was fitted to one end
and a somewhat crude live centre with a number of replaceable centre
shells to the other.
The bottom of the body which rested on the bed was relieved on
the milling machine to leave a 1" section which fitted between the
bed tubes with another milled steel plate to clamp onto the bottom of
the bed tubes. When the clamp was loosened, the tailstock could be
slid along the bed and then clamped in any working position. I
thought at the time that the threaded shaft should be drilled so that
an auger could be passed through to allow long hole boring- in fact I
spent several hours boring the five spindles. I found that, in
practice, the tailstock design did not allow this to be accomplished
easily. Again, the lack of a Morse taper seriously restricts the
possibility of accurate drilling from the tailstock end. It is
virtually impossible to fit a drill chuck without a major
modification.
We managed to get five banjo castings from another
Technical College. We had to bore these and thread where appropriate.
The banjo could be locked in position on the bed by a clamping method
similar to that used on the tailstock. All of the levers were made
from steel rod which was threaded where necessary. The actual tool
rest should be as sturdy as possible - I would suggest it should be
made from 3/4" round bar steel. Different sizes (lengths) and shapes
will be required, but I would suggest starting with a 6" rest and
then making the others to suit when necessary.
There are a number of items which are either essential or
can make your turning easier and more enjoyable.
1 A spur drive for the headstock. If your lathe has a Morse
taper, most tool dealers can supply a propriety unit. You will find
that a large and a small spur will cover most work.
2 A tailstock centre is essential for spindle turning. There are a
number of types available, (you can make your own), all of which
carry a Morse taper. I would recommend a "ring" centre - these are
very safe, don't split small section timber and if using a removable
centre point, can help with long hole boring.
3 Several sizes of faceplate for bowl turning.
1 A drill chuck which fits to the headstock and tailstock.
2 A four jaw scroll chuck which operates in both expansion and
contraction mode. Once you have used one of these it will become
essential.
3 A well made screw chuck with a replaceable screw.
Since first making my lathe I have made a series of modifications
which have made it a more useable machine and a pleasure to work.
When I first used my lathe, I found that the bed tubes were curved so
that the gap between them was around .080" wider in the middle of the
bed. This meant that accurate work was not possible. To overcome this
I lifted off the head and tailstocks and fitted steel "bed bars" to
the tubes. The bars were 2" x ½" and had a similar bar fitted
inside the tube. They were drilled and tapped in pairs and fitted to
the tubes. They were set up to give an exact 1"gap between them.
Apart from giving an accurate bed, the bars also added to the general
rigidity.
At the same time I had a new tailstock made up. The
original was not accurate enough and was very clumsy to use. The new
unit consisted of a small cast iron tailstock with a number 2 Morse
taper.
This was mounted onto a fabricated heavy steel box
incorporating a quick release camlock. This has worked extremely
well.
Originally I fitted up the motor and drive with a three ring pulley.
Because of the mounting system, speed changing was slow and clumsy. I
obtained a simple mechanical variable speed drive from an old gluing
machine and this gives me a stepless speed range of around 350 - 1800
RPM The only drawbacks with this system are noise and belt wear. Once
you have used a V.S.D. you wouldn't want anything else.
The last major modification was to fit a vacuum system to
the lathe using a Gast vacuum pump with a storage tank fitted with a
non-return valve. I've developed a series of chucks which enable me
to hold bowls down to 3 ½ " diameter for cleaning up the bottom.
Other chucks allow me to hold discs for platters, etc., up to 14
½" diameter and any thickness. The pump came from a small offset
printing machine, (an A.B.Dick), and will run continuously when
driven by a 1/4 h.p. motor.
It's been a lot of work, but the result has been
worthwhile.
I would suggest again that you investigate the possibility of buying
a good secondhand machine.